=== Whether John McCain or Barack Obama, remember to register to vote! ===

DID YOU KNOW THAT MORE PEOPLE DIED EVERY DAY UNDER SADDAM'S RULE IN IRAQ THAN ARE DYING EVERY DAY CURRENTLY?

user ballots

news related :

DID YOU KNOW THAT MORE PEOPLE DIED EVERY DAY UNDER SADDAM'S RULE IN IRAQ THAN ARE DYING EVERY DAY CURRENTLY?


[+] serious ballot by jenny17
created Fri Jun 25, 04

This is true, look up some statistics. On some days in Iraq, upwards of 500 people lost their lives to Saddam's regime. Did you realize this?

Yes, I knew this, thank goodness Saddam is gone
No, I did not, thank you for telling me

Ballot #39350 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
53291. After a number of car bombs today 40 people have died in Iraq. Why do some on this site continue to pretend that the situation is getting better?
86756. People aged 15-30: Did it feel like part of your childhood died when Rod Roddy died a few years ago?
75009. Could the reason be people are dying?
97153. It's your choice, pick a way to rule the people of the earth
13811. Since this poll was made, 500 Americans have died fighting Israel's long standing enemy Iraq. Your thoughts?
17307. 500 American soldiers have died in Iraq so Bush could get revenge for his dad, Cheney could get huge Oil contracts, and Israel could be more secure...
63114. over 10,000 people have died in asia!
106479. Would more, or fewer, people have died in the U.S. if there was no FDA?
101541. How many people died during the Boston "Massacre"?
100640. There are more people alive today than have ever died. True or false?


COMMENTS:
No, I did not know this.

I just wish it hadn't turned into a contest.
by Cathexis on Fri Jun 25, 04 4:25pm [+]

Exactly jenny17 you hit the nail on the head. Saddam is a bad man. He killed lots of people. You are 100% correct... There's just one thing you forgot to mention. The fact is that the U.S. embraced Saddam Hussein in the early 1980's, including the renewal of diplomatic relations that had been suspended since 1967. During this period of renewed U.S. support for Saddam, he had invaded his neighbor (Iran), had long-range nuclear aspirations that would "probably" include "an eventual nuclear weapon capability," harbored known terrorists in Baghdad, abused the human rights of his citizens, and possessed and used chemical weapons on Iranians and his own people. The U.S. response was to renew ties, to provide intelligence and aid to ensure Iraq would not be defeated by Iran, and to send a high-level presidential envoy named Donald Rumsfeld to shake hands with Saddam in 1983. ... So why did we support this man who kills hundreds of people, then start a war against this man which killed hundreds of people. Kind of ironic don't you think?
by xxxxxxxx on Fri Jun 25, 04 7:15pm [+]

Nice fact finding Jenny17.
by doen5167 on Fri Jun 25, 04 11:54pm [+]

Hey that's not fair... Saddam had decades to work up to those kind of numbers... GW's only had a few years, give him time, he'll get there. GW's just toying with the lives using torture as foreplay to his climactic rush to break the record!
by MO_ on Wed Jun 30, 04 3:36pm [+]

I bet nobody thought Dubya could break the record of felons executed while he was Texas Governor. But he did! Go Dubya. Go Dubya. Go Dubya.
by cretin_slap on Mon Jul 19, 04 11:58am [+]

Yeah totally I may not aggree with the reasons for the war but you cant argue with the fact that Saddam was a evil man and getting rid of him was a good thing.
by seon on Tue Aug 24, 04 10:05pm [+]

Ten thousand civilians have been 'liberated' of their lives in Iraq since the invasion.

Time to do some more research, kiddo.
by Mantits on Tue Sep 14, 04 11:14pm [+]

what's wrong with killing felons?
by beefgerky17 on Thu Jan 13, 05 1:33pm [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved