=== Whether John McCain or Barack Obama, remember to register to vote! ===

WAR ON TERRORISM OR WAR ON SANITY?

user ballots

prediction : political :

WAR ON TERRORISM OR WAR ON SANITY?


[+] ballot by i_carnt_spel
created Fri Oct 31, 03

"ASSOCIATED PRESS – Pentagon adviser Richard Perle said Tuesday that the recent Israeli attack on an alleged training camp for Palestinian militants in Syria was long overdue and that he would not rule out U.S. military action against the Arab state. . . Perle said it would not be difficult to commit forces to Syria despite heavy U.S. troop commitments to Iraq and the Korean peninsula, along with a continued presence in areas such as the Balkans and Liberia. "Syria is militarily very weak," he said."

Invading Syria should calm things down.
Invading Syria should make potential terrorists happy and peaceful
Invading Syria will get the Bush family more oil money.
Invading Syria will help spread freedom and democracy.
Bush needs to be stopped. Now!


Ballot #4241 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
61444. A list of users who are teetering on the edge of sanity or have already fallen off?
89131. If the need for oil was suddenly gone, would this lower the incidences of terrorism throughout the world, or would terrorism increase dramatically?
78053. Does fighting terrorism with terrorism or un-ethical actions make you a hypocrite?
73762. Will the War on Terrorism remain a war on Terrorism?
97928. Who will win the war on terrorism?
101774. How serious are we, really, about Terrorism?
51799. Are we really winning the war against Terrorism?
72205. Is the war on terrorism no different than the war on drugs?
97045. What is the root cause of terrorism?
119020. Could these Wildfires be Terrorism?


COMMENTS:
Perpetual war in the Middle East. Born again Christian insane drug addict US President. Nazi advisors. Anybody worried?
by i_carnt_spel on Fri Oct 31, 03 3:49am [+]

It appears nobody else is, Miss Tulsa. As soon as I put up this ballot loads more political ballots arrived in front of them to push this one off the list. I think there are some people on this site trying to affect the type of ballots that get the most attention.
by i_carnt_spel on Mon Nov 03, 03 3:04am [+]

Liberal crybaby! :o)
by i_carnt_spel on Tue Nov 04, 03 4:15am [+]

I know Mae from European chat room she is not a liberal her friend who is Arab was arrested and questioned for 33 days on the terrorism issue I think she is worried on Homeland Security issue now
by lilimarlene on Tue Nov 04, 03 5:15am [+]

Miss Tulsa/Mae
by lilimarlene on Tue Nov 04, 03 5:16am [+]

Just a joke lili. Observe my smily face. Should have made it wink ;o)
by i_carnt_spel on Tue Nov 04, 03 8:51am [+]

That is a sad situation. It seems the only way the mass of the population got any rights is to band together and make it happen. Nowadays people are isolated in their homes and fed propaganda through the tv. We can't leave our welfare to people who say on tv they are looking after it. Hope your Arab friend manages to get it back together.
by i_carnt_spel on Wed Nov 05, 03 2:18am [+]

Sorry, I was not familiar with your symbols :0) O American one I do not take everything literal my jokes I guess are not funny in English
by lilimarlene on Wed Nov 05, 03 9:51am [+]

Not a problem lili :oP
by i_carnt_spel on Fri Nov 07, 03 3:09am [+]

Legislative Acts can be repealed. The Patriot Acts are no exception.
by Jabberwocky on Mon Jan 12, 04 8:57pm [+]

How does terrorism compare with other risks? Our reactions to the possibility of terrorism are out of proportion to the facts.Upward of 320,000 Americans died in homicides or suicides during the period 1996-2002. That amounts to about 45,000 people per year, and the chance that an American might die this way is roughly one in 6,500. American deaths from terrorism during that period amounted to only 1,538, including over 1,400 Americans who died in the 9-11 attacks. In this period, inclusive of 9-11, the chance of an American dying by terrorist hands was roughly one in 1.3 million.There is genuine concern in many parts of our society about losses of life through accidents and murder or suicide, but there is no great political furor about any of it.
Nor do we seem prepared to deal effectively-assuming that we could-- with the mayhem annually perpetrated by use of firearms.Why is it therefore that our leadership has been driven to a state of near paranoia by terrorism?
Who are the targets of fear marketing? We Americans are the targets. Politicians argue that not telling us about threats is a bad policy. The net effect of current terrorism information policy, notably the national alert system, keeps us apprehensive, and gives the terrorists one of their best tools: fear.
by Qui_Qui on Tue Feb 17, 04 5:11pm [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved