=== Whether John McCain or Barack Obama, remember to register to vote! ===

IS FOX NEWS A DANGER TO MEDIA NEUTRALITY?

user ballots

choices : political :

IS FOX NEWS A DANGER TO MEDIA NEUTRALITY?


[+] ballot by xxxxxxxx
created Mon Nov 03, 03

The BBC and the National Association of Broadcasters gave notice that Fox news is a danger to media neutrality. What is your opinion?

Fox is in violation
Fox is not in violation
The entire British policy is censorship
Fox News just lies
Unlike BBC
O'Reily and Fox News are true Patriots
Fox News for President
Kerry and Teddie are afraid of FOX
Ask Hanoi Jane/Kerry
Fox News- the Media Wing of the GOP


Ballot #4442 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
23999. State of News Media 2004 - What do you think?
114142. Should the news media air the Cho video and photos?
66079. Canadians: Are we brainwashed by the liberal media? Is Fox News right?
79334. Does the news media feed a psychopath's behavior?
85288. In your opinion is the news media still failing the American people?
75225. Regardless of whatever bias there is, does the mass media do a good job reporting real news?
64367. Does the news media have too much economic interest in large corporations to accurately present the truth?
92328. If 9/11 was a CIA/govt/bush/USA conspiracy, why are no liberal members of congress or REAL news media covering this?
51618. Which is a more reliable news source: Fox News or Weekly World News?
61446. Why is it that when CBS, a neutral media source, makes an honest mistake about George W. Bush, it's because "the media is liberal" ...


COMMENTS:
Some government officials in Great Britain uses the "nuetrality" word to censore things they don't agree with. Banning something because it doesn't present the news the way you want is CENSORSHIP!
by liberaljim on Mon Nov 03, 03 9:24pm [+]

Why do you think ANY media is neutral? They all have their biases. Although, I have to admit, Fox News seems less newsworthy and more half-assed than most media outlets. But then, 20/20, Dateline and other similar "invesigative journalism" shows have all dropped a few IQ points in the last few years.Jonh Stossel recently reported on the imminent crises of Teflon poisoning. WTF? Why have celebrity scandals been making the front page of my local "respectable" newspaper? If you want news, open your eyes, don't just turn on the TV or open the paper. You'll only get what other people think is the news. Wow. That was a lot more than I intened to say. I do rant a lot, don't I?
by Foxx on Sat Jan 03, 04 2:33am [+]

Since when has the Networks ever been neutral? With over 70% having a leftist agenda.
by Dragonman657 on Mon Jan 12, 04 1:55pm [+]

Its all lies from every camp. Fox is meant to make righties feel they getting the truth so they'll believe what's reported. Likewise CNN and MSNBC make the libs feel cozy because FOX seems so wrong. So bam both sides feel like they are getting 100% USDA Grade A TRUTH. Wrong on both accounts.
by dumbamerican on Mon Jan 19, 04 9:34am [+]

I see their propaganda on ads in the buggies of my grocery story... it's sad that people will buy this "Fair and Balanced News" garbage. Right and center is as balanced as it gets.
by Wark on Mon Jan 26, 04 11:24am [+]

Media neutrality? No such thing. Never has been, never will be. Sorry, that's just the truth.
by Mean_Gene on Wed Apr 07, 04 3:29pm [+]

(most) TV Networks = shills for the corporations that own them
by mojo on Sun May 16, 04 1:05pm [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved