search this site: search the web:

DO ALL NATIONS HAVE THE RIGHT TO CONDUCT PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKES?

choices : political :

DO ALL NATIONS HAVE THE RIGHT TO CONDUCT PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKES?


[+] serious ballot by Corrupt
created Fri Aug 20, 04

Iran has said that it will not wait for Israel or America to strike first.If Iran feels threatend by Israel or America it will lauch a pre-emptive attack on Israel's nuclear program.Do you believe that Iran or any other country besides America has the right to lauch a pre-emptive strike?After all if America has the right to use a pre-emptive attack inorder to defend it'self why shouldn't Iran or China or India have that same right?

Yes,all countries have the right to defend themselves.
No,pre-emptive strikes are reserved for rational and sane countries only.
Any nation that launches a 1st strike is insane.
No
No nation should do this, including the US.
Register to submit choices


Ballot #47725 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:
Register to submit comments
You may still vote without registration

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:








similiar ballots:
102393. Should the world launch a pre-emptive strike..
37892. Do people where you live conduct neighborhood watches?
95025. Worst place to conduct an armed robbery?
117409. Man accused of lewd conduct in airport bathroom
102334. American Values: Pre-emptive nuclear strike on Iran?
59346. Why is the Bush administration determined to drum up support for a pre-emptive strike against Iran?
16800. Why do Bush and his followers think it's holy to cut down entire forests, pollute the air and water, and to conduct a war based on lies?
1296. Should 3 strikes law be overturned?
33408. Yes/No, American justice? Soldier receives maximum : Sivits jailed for 1 year, reduced in rank, discharged for bad conduct.
33794. Soldier found guilty of desertion sentenced: National Guard sergeant gets year in jail, bad conduct discharge.




whatisit? - smilesheet - quick ref. - hel.lo v.0.01

COMMENTS:
They can do whatever they want. If theyre launching a preemptive strike, then obviously they feel they can get away with it and other nations have the right to gang up on em tho. Iran can try that, but would probably be defeated rapidly if they did so.
by CletuSlackedJawYokel on Fri Aug 20, 04 6:01pm [+]

Any nation that launches a 1st strike is insane.
by ABC on Fri Aug 20, 04 6:05pm [+]

You got my vote ABC.
by xaman on Fri Aug 20, 04 6:16pm [+]

asking for it
by x__ on Fri Aug 20, 04 9:56pm [+]

all mention of pre-emptive strikes on fox news should be replaced by Saddamming or Osamabinladenizing...

So, should we be Osamabinladenizing North Korea?
by LCD on Fri Aug 20, 04 10:59pm [+]

Some one once said that pre emptive strikes are not a way of declaring war. Well they're wrong. It's same as planing a covert operation. To me it is same as declaring war.
by BigDaddy6911111 on Sat Aug 21, 04 12:12am [+]

What ever happened when a country wanted to attack someone no one cared? Before countries would just invade one another didn't have this un stuff and didn't have to go by any rules people just did what they felt like. Frankly i don't care if iran invades the whole middle east its not my problem.
by vanman1970 on Sat Aug 21, 04 12:32pm [+]

Depends. I'm glad israel launched a preemptive strike on iraq while the west sat around complaining and doing nothing. If they hadn't saddam would have had nukes in the early 90s, and he could have easily dominated the middle east. I think that makes the case for some preemptive strikes, if they're done appropriately.
by herzog on Sat Aug 21, 04 1:09pm [+]

If they did, Israel wouldn't exist
by Penisaurus_REX on Sat Aug 21, 04 2:37pm [+]

Well they can. But they would have to answer to the global iron fist of America.
by DeathMetal_101 on Sat Jul 30, 05 12:23am [+]





About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | © 2002-2009 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved