DO ALL NATIONS HAVE THE RIGHT TO CONDUCT PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKES?

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

choices : political : DO ALL NATIONS HAVE THE RIGHT TO CONDUCT PRE-EMPTIVE STRIKES?

[+] serious ballot by Corrupt
created Fri Aug 20, 04
Iran has said that it will not wait for Israel or America to strike first.If Iran feels threatend by Israel or America it will lauch a pre-emptive attack on Israel's nuclear program.Do you believe that Iran or any other country besides America has the right to lauch a pre-emptive strike?After all if America has the right to use a pre-emptive attack inorder to defend it'self why shouldn't Iran or China or India have that same right?

Yes,all countries have the right to defend themselves.
No,pre-emptive strikes are reserved for rational and sane countries only.
Any nation that launches a 1st strike is insane.
No
No nation should do this, including the US.

Ballot #47725 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

similiar ballots:
102393. Should the world launch a pre-emptive strike..
95025. Worst place to conduct an armed robbery?
117409. Man accused of lewd conduct in airport bathroom
102334. American Values: Pre-emptive nuclear strike on Iran?
1296. Should 3 strikes law be overturned?
59346. Why is the Bush administration determined to drum up support for a pre-emptive strike against Iran?
101144. The Religion of Peace Strikes Again?
128401. When buying from a company. How many strikes before you never buy there ...
16800. Why do Bush and his followers think it's holy to cut down entire forests, pollute the air and water, and to conduct a war based on lies?
126816. Who's sense of humor most strikes a chord with you?

COMMENTS:
They can do whatever they want. If theyre launching a preemptive strike, then obviously they feel they can get away with it and other nations have the right to gang up on em tho. Iran can try that, but would probably be defeated rapidly if they did so.

by CletuSlackedJawYokel on Fri Aug 20, 04 6:01pm [+]

Any nation that launches a 1st strike is insane.

by ABC on Fri Aug 20, 04 6:05pm [+]

You got my vote ABC.

by xaman on Fri Aug 20, 04 6:16pm [+]

asking for it

by x__ on Fri Aug 20, 04 9:56pm [+]

all mention of pre-emptive strikes on fox news should be replaced by Saddamming or Osamabinladenizing...

So, should we be Osamabinladenizing North Korea?

by LCD on Fri Aug 20, 04 10:59pm [+]

Some one once said that pre emptive strikes are not a way of declaring war. Well they're wrong. It's same as planing a covert operation. To me it is same as declaring war.

by BigDaddy6911111 on Sat Aug 21, 04 12:12am [+]

What ever happened when a country wanted to attack someone no one cared? Before countries would just invade one another didn't have this un stuff and didn't have to go by any rules people just did what they felt like. Frankly i don't care if iran invades the whole middle east its not my problem.

by vanman1970 on Sat Aug 21, 04 12:32pm [+]

Depends. I'm glad israel launched a preemptive strike on iraq while the west sat around complaining and doing nothing. If they hadn't saddam would have had nukes in the early 90s, and he could have easily dominated the middle east. I think that makes the case for some preemptive strikes, if they're done appropriately.

by herzog on Sat Aug 21, 04 1:09pm [+]

If they did, Israel wouldn't exist

by Penisaurus_REX on Sat Aug 21, 04 2:37pm [+]

Well they can. But they would have to answer to the global iron fist of America.

by DeathMetal_101 on Sat Jul 30, 05 12:23am [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact