SHOULD PRISONS BE USED AS PUNISHMENT OR AS REHABILITATION?

user ballots

advice : culture :

SHOULD PRISONS BE USED AS PUNISHMENT OR AS REHABILITATION?


[+] ballot by xxxxxxxx
created Sun Sep 12, 04

A big problem with the penal system is that it seems to focus more on punishing the convicted rather than rehabilitate them. To me, the problem isn't THAT they committed a crime but WHY they committed a crime. If you get to the root of that, you'll be able to take a better approach to stop the criminal's behavior rather than simply locking them up and then releasing them, oftentimes with the criminals not having improved. I do understand the idea of "setting an example" by sending people to prison, and to an extent it's a good thing in and of itself, but when people get out of prison, instantly convict a crime, and end up in prison, it's obvious that they didn't benefit at all from their stay. Oftemtimes, if people are under the impression that they're being punished, they'll act out and rebel from the source that's punishing them (which in the case of prisoners tends to be society in general). That said, rehabilitation could help to determine the root cause for the desire to commit a crime, whether it's psychological or whatever. Should prisons aim more for rehabilitation so that when the prisoners' sentences are up, they can become upstanding and contributing members of the community? Please give your reasons in the comment section.

100% rehabilitation.
75% rehabilitation, 25% punishment.
50% rehabilitation, 50% punishment.
25% rehabilitation, 75% punishment.
100% punishment.
Prisons only teach people to be worse criminals
Prisons create resentment / desire for vengeance


Ballot #50647 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
3420. Why are prisons so sick with crime?
12857. are high schools like prisons ?
102157. U.S. holds 14,000 in secret prisons
125797. Why should the taxpayers pay for prisons, shouldn't they be paying us?
51150. Is it really cruel and unusual to ask that the rich go to the same prisons as the poor?
94805. Should all the people who support America’s illegal prisons be sent to Guantanamo Bay?
34097. It is the 22nd century and crime is rife. prisons cannot cope with the influx of criminals and are full to capacity.
31403. What was the worst PUNISHMENT you've ever gotten when you were a kid?
65040. what punishment should be given to this child?
69470. Reward and Punishment


COMMENTS:
Prisons should be used to contain politicians to make this a safer world for all
by Alien_Invader on Sun Sep 12, 04 7:59am [+]

Well not all politicians , but most of them.
by Alien_Invader on Sun Sep 12, 04 8:07am [+]

You make an excellent point Counciltucky, (paragraphs next time, though, please). I think it depends upon the nature of the crime. If were talking about non-violent drug offenses, 99% of those people should have the opportunity for rehabilitation. Did you know that it costs $20,000 to $50,000 a year to feed, clothe, and house an inmate? Of course, we also turn ordinary people into criminals since marijuana is Schedule I (lol). Give me a break.

Much of our prisons are indeed a "revolving-door" system. Someone commits a crime, goes to jail, is released into the same conditions, now probably just more pissed at the world and the system, commits the same crime, goes to jail, etc.

For thieves, wouldn't it be more effective to have a cohesive exit strategy (job skills, employment) than to send them back into the poverty that no doubt caused them to commit the crime in the first place?

I do feel that most murderers - certainly the ones whose murders were premeditated - should be punished. As it is now, a lot of them get less jail time than the drug offenders! Can you explain that to me?
by Applerod on Sun Sep 12, 04 10:56am [+]

prison obviously isn't a deterrent, so we should make it a deterrent. Rehab obviously does not work, as 70% of criminals released from prison re-offend, so 70% of the money spent on rehab is wasted. I say make it 100% punishment, and if you are one of the 30% who can be reformed, then tough, you shouldnt have comitted the crime in the first place
by Preparation_H on Sun Sep 12, 04 10:57am [+]

I really don't feel that creating more prisons is going to solve this problem. There are unjust laws as there are unjust men. There will always be criminals - but if you examine the conditions and actions that lead to the particular crime and subsequent imprisonment, you can work towards preventing it from happening in the future.

Just because something is illegal doesn't necessary make it so that people who don't abide the law should be turned into social outcasts, at the people's expense.
by Applerod on Sun Sep 12, 04 3:28pm [+]

Prisons don't seem to work all that well. We ought to copy singapore, give the person a fair trial, cane them, and send them on their way. It's cheaper and appears to be more effective.
by herzog on Mon Sep 13, 04 12:25am [+]

Yeah I agree herzog (and how often does THAT happen?!) -- but someone will claim that it's "cruel and unusual punishment." It won't be unusual if it's used as a standard punishment, and as for cruel, that's kind of a vague concept -- what one thinks is cruel someone else may think is just fine.
by xxxxxxxx on Mon Sep 13, 04 12:03pm [+]

Confining someone to a tiny cell in an environment where they could be raped or killed seems cruel to me.
by Applerod on Tue Sep 14, 04 12:37am [+]

Lots of valid point, Counciltucky. My impression is that prisons create more problems than they solve.

It seems to me that when we send someone to prison, we want to accomplish two mutually-exclusive goals: We want convicts punished (hurt for hurting us) and rehabilitated (made better than they were when we sent them to prison). It seems something like trying to teach someone a foreign language while you torture them with thumbscrews throughout the process. Can't imagine anyone learning much under such circumstances. So, as bad as we want to get revenge against a malefactor, we must realize that we can't have it both ways.

From a strictly practical point of view, we need to realize that it costs about 30K to keep a person in prison, and if we keep up with the decline of rehabilitation and increase of punitive prisons, we will reap the whirlwind. Let's move toward psychotherapy, good vocational trainings, and secondary, and post-secondary education. I would expect much better outcomes from this course.

No one approach is a panacea, but rehabilitation is better for the convict, and for us in the long term.

Thanks for your ballot.
by xxxxxxxx on Sat Apr 23, 05 3:43pm [+]

Create a develis island like France did years ago. Drop them off there and let them live or die amongst themselves.
by hurricane on Fri May 26, 06 4:51am [+]

Voted : 50% rehabilitation, 50% punishment.
it should be used for both becaes every body deserves a sacond chance
by Guest User from [150.176.227.130] on Mon Sep 25, 06 6:46am [+]

yall are crazy prison does not teach people to be worse criminals it teaches them that things can be what you make of them and if you deside to be a criminal then you are going to pay the price our juditial system does exacly wha it should do
by Guest User from [150.176.227.130] on Mon Sep 25, 06 6:53am [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved