search this site: search the web:
7 out of 100 Eliot Spitzer's Hookers recommend bestandworst.com!

ARE PEOPLE MORE VIOLENTLY OPPOSED TO FUR RATHER THAN LEATHER

user ballots

ARE PEOPLE MORE VIOLENTLY OPPOSED TO FUR RATHER THAN LEATHER


[+] ballot by xxxxxxxx
created Mon Sep 20, 04

because it's much easier to harass rich women than motorcycle gangs?

Yes
No
I only harass rich old ladies
I harass both but I now have a motorcycle chain lodged up my *ss


Ballot #51796 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
64494. Have you ever violently taken a man from behind?
105621. Houston police violently attack peaceful demonstration
117286. STRAIGHT MEN: Would you wear leather chaps into a gay bar for $50,000?
55528. Why do cows wear leather and taste of meat?
68111. Who Looks better in Tight Black Leather: Kate or Carrie?
122210. Is it racist to be opposed to interspecies relationships?
14054. Why are Liberal left-wingers opposed to gun ownership?
115109. Survey: U.S. Muslims Assimilated, Opposed to Extremism
128410. Do you miss traditional animated movies as opposed to CG?
14806. Ever notice on this site how "peace loving", "open minded" liberals want to violently hurt, and perversely torture anyone that disagrees with them?


COMMENTS:
Leather is a bi product from the animals we eat, rather than the animal being harvested only fot their fur, either one does not bother me.
by ABC on Mon Sep 20, 04 6:43pm [+]

I'm gonna make me some ABC-strap dancing shoes. I'll probably only wear them once. But that one minute hike through the sewage will have been worth it. You'd sacrifice yourself for me, right ABC?
by magdalenasdollar on Mon Sep 20, 04 6:46pm [+]

Yes because if you were violently opposed to leather and some big bacon was walking down the road in a leather jacket and you decided to throw a gallon of paint over him as you were an animal rights protestor or something, something tells me that you would about to be violently rearranged aswell as violently opposed.
by xxxxxxxx on Mon Sep 20, 04 6:46pm [+]

I would think more people would be violently opposed to leather cause of repressed memories or get whipped with it as a child but fur does cause more allergies.
by xxxxxxxx on Mon Sep 20, 04 6:47pm [+]

No worries Mag, I am getting older I am sure I will have enough excess skin soon for your shoes.
by ABC on Mon Sep 20, 04 6:48pm [+]

YAY! :)

...Well, I suppose that depends on where the skin comes from...
by magdalenasdollar on Mon Sep 20, 04 7:26pm [+]

Fur is showy. It was 'classy' in the 80's, but now it's tacky unless you're an Eskimo.
by x__ on Mon Sep 20, 04 8:18pm [+]

Hmmm. Good question. I don't know, but the anti-fur people do get more press.
by Cathexis on Tue Sep 21, 04 10:27am [+]

leather is kind of functional, you really can't argue about leather without being a whiner. I'm not gonna carry signs about how bad fur is unless it's a protest about how cave-man tacky it is (unless you're an Eskimo of course)
by x__ on Tue Sep 21, 04 12:40pm [+]

Cowhide.

It's not just for breakfast anymore.
by SCREAMING_FROG on Tue Sep 21, 04 1:31pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved