user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
That is scary....Let me be clear...NO...
Lets have a look...
The Bush Guide to International Policy: OK, we tell em, we are after terrorists, then get that b*stard Saddam, who has absolutely no link to Osama andthe 9/11 tragedies.
Who also says 'I am steadfast'... even if he makes mistakes he will be 'steadfast'
Nice to see that he will be 'steadfast' with the lives of young men and women. Lets all praise the President, who wont 'veer' from his course.
How many more US troops will be sacrificed?
Well, as long as it isnt him, why should he care.
Bending over and taking a stiff one is not a good policy.
MrTroche
That goes both ways.
I have no idea if they will be good. But it is a statistical impossibility that they will be worsethan Bush's.
IOt's hard to predict what Kerry will do once he takes office, but I do believe that if he sticks to what he says in the debates and his campaign, it'll at least be an improvement over Bush.
Bush made it clear how little respect he has for 'farn' countries who aren't bowing to his imperial war crap, as long as he's in office he'll alienate any strong independent country who won't go along with him, anyone in the world who's paying attention to us right now knows this about Bush.
by x__ on Fri Oct 01, 04 7:58pm
[+]
I expect Kerry to be a complete disaster.
Poor Bush, he did the best he could, he probably would have done all right for Four More Glorious Years..!!
Personally I wish there were no politics or politicians.. We need intelligent technicians, not silly politicians..! Not rabidly opposing 'political parties', but a unified highly trained team of experts, wonder workers..
Holy
The word you're looking for is Libertarians.
Iguana
I agree, that's why I'm voting for Badnarik.
Wasn't his whole foriegn policy to get others to support us in all our endevours? Sounds good, but what happens when they say no? As france has vowed to do regardless of who wins.
Basically his whole platform right now regarding the coalition is 'our coalition sucks, we need to get france and germany to send troops'. Both nations have stated publicly that they will not, under any circumstances send troops to iraq. Got a plan B mr kerry?
Not assuming Kerry is being honest...and admittedly, that's always a huge assumption to make with politicians. Kerry has stated that even if he had known in advance that Iraq had no WMDs, he would have voted in favor of Bush's war anyway. Note: that's an even more radical position than was taken by Bush, who at least PRETENDED he believed the weapons were there in order to provide an excuse for the war. Now Kerry is reduced to saying he'll run the war the same as Bush, only better, somehow. When asked how he makes vague noises about getting more foreigners involved. Lotsa luck. The message is clear: neither of these 2 bums is worth so much as a used condom. Your only honorable path: either don't vote or vote Libertarian, which amounts to the same thing.
it's great to vote libertarian, really, totally, I sure wish we were somewhere close to accepting a third party. but isn't a vote for the Libertarian candidate really a vote for Bush? Honestly, think real hard, everyone who actually takes their lazy ass all the way to the polls to then cast their one vote using at against Kerry is only insuring four more years. (am i the only one who sees that?) Are the people who want to vote for Badnarik just ashamed ex Bushies?
by x__ on Fri Oct 08, 04 4:11pm
[+]
x__: No, they're the ones brave enough to actually *do something* about the pitiful situation of the two-party system. People who feel they have to vote for the least worst of the two major parties even though they don't want to are only perpetuating the two party system. In the years to come they will continuously find themselves stuck voting AGAINST a candidate, rather than FOR one. Isn't that type of voting kind of a waste?
It is a waste, it really is sad. It just seems like a lot hangs on what this country decides in the next couple years.
by x__ on Mon Oct 11, 04 4:56pm
[+]
Of course not..
|
|
