search this site: search the web:
7 out of 100 Eliot Spitzer's Hookers recommend bestandworst.com!

WHY IS KERRY ACCUSED BY SOME ON B&W 'WEAK' BECAUSE THEY BELIEVE HE SAID TERRORISM IS A NUISANCE, WHEN HE DIDNT SAY THAT.

user ballots

choices : political :

WHY IS KERRY ACCUSED BY SOME ON B&W 'WEAK' BECAUSE THEY BELIEVE HE SAID TERRORISM IS A NUISANCE, WHEN HE DIDNT SAY THAT.


[+] ballot by Steelhamster
created Mon Oct 25, 04

I have seen certain members of B&W accuse Kerry of saying this, when he said no such thing, and Bush should also be accused of being weak as he said a similar thing.

Kerry's words are taken from a New York Times Magazine interview published Oct. 10. When asked what it would take to make Americans feel safe again, Kerry actually said this:

Kerry: We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they're a nuisance. . .

Any law-enforcement person, would tell you we're never going to end prostitution. We're never going to end illegal gambling. But we're going to reduce it, organized crime, to a level where it isn't on the rise. It isn't threatening people's lives every day, and fundamentally, it's something that you continue to fight, but it's not threatening the fabric of your life.


This is what Bush himself said Aug. 30 on the NBC Today Show:

Q: Do you really think we can win this war of terror on terror, for example, in the next four years?

Bush: I have never said we can win it in four years.

Q: No, I'm just saying, can we win it? Do you see that?

Bush: I don't, I don't think you can win it, but I think you can create conditions so that those who use terror as a tool are less acceptable in parts of the world, let's put it that way.

Both men were attacked by partisan opponents for expressing these sentiments, and have since grown less candid about the prospects for eradicating terrorism entirely.

Both have hardened their words. Bush says he will 'win the war on terror. Kerry says he 'will kill the terrorists.'


But as is the usual case with those who only see one side of an argument, these little facts like terrorists, become a nuisance.

They are partisan
They are not interested in facts
Some need to be convinced.
Other [Comment]

Ballot #56436 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
61089. Dandelions: Nuisance or pretty?
89131. If the need for oil was suddenly gone, would this lower the incidences of terrorism throughout the world, or would terrorism increase dramatically?
78053. Does fighting terrorism with terrorism or un-ethical actions make you a hypocrite?
127161. What Is The Major Cause Of The Weak U.S. Dollar ?
75014. why didnt AMERICA have more pilots
73762. Will the War on Terrorism remain a war on Terrorism?
14217. could hitler have won ww2 if he didnt invade russia?
35594. Do Women Weed Out Strong Men From Weak Men By Challenging Them?
103319. What attacks are dark-type Pokemon weak against?
101979. "You are too _ _ _!" What have you been accused of?


COMMENTS:
Kerry: We have to get back to the place we were, where terrorists are not the focus of our lives, but they're a nuisance. . . "

I don't want terrorism to be merely a "nuisance"; I want it to be nonexistent. Kerry wants to pretend like it's September 10, 2001, and so he doesn't appear to understand the full scope of the problem. He also said that each terrorist attack will be met with an answer. I don't want it answered; I want the "question" to never be asked (preemption).
by WalterPeck_EPA on Mon Oct 25, 04 2:16pm [+]

You dont get it.This game of terrorist-Counter Terrorist is a game that Lunatic Republican{s} is playing with our lives & our land.They didnt attack us unprovoked.Thats bullshit & most of us that can add up actions & consequences can see this.
by Qui_Qui on Mon Oct 25, 04 3:04pm [+]

I dont feel " safe " when my point of view is stifled,beaten & thrown in jail because some Dicktator doesnt want to hear it.Who does this monkey work for???Hes supposed to represent ME.Work for ME.Not his own hidden agendas.He outa there...
by Qui_Qui on Mon Oct 25, 04 3:12pm [+]

But Qui! "We must complete the mission"!

Wait, is that a quote from Bush or from a video game...? Can't remember...
by magdalenasdollar on Mon Oct 25, 04 3:26pm [+]

If he wants to play war games,let him play Day of Defeat or Counter Strike....bet his stats would suck...
by Qui_Qui on Mon Oct 25, 04 3:44pm [+]

So WalterPeck, by your own admission, Bush is as guilty as Kerry, for wanting the current rate of terrorism to be a nuisance value?

We live in a world that has always had terrorism and always will have, so your wish that there be no terrorism, will not be achieved by either candidate.
by Steelhamster on Mon Oct 25, 04 4:31pm [+]

Bush never downplayed the threat of terrorism in his quote, as Kerry did in his.

And, no one's trying to stifle your right to free speech, Qui. In fact, the Kerry people threatened to sue television stations who ran the Swift Vet ads, and they're filing complaints with the FCC against Sinclair Broadcasting for wanting to run a Kerry/Vietnam documentary. The Bush campaign never tried to get the Michael Moore film banned from theaters.
by WalterPeck_EPA on Mon Oct 25, 04 7:39pm [+]

The republicans Paid for the makeshift jail During the RNC in New York,Held people for days while muggers could make booking in only 12 hours.There were Republican people yelling at these people You need to be taught a lesson.What praytell would this "lesson" be?
by Qui_Qui on Mon Oct 25, 04 8:04pm [+]

WalterPeck, did you not read what I put in the ballot?

Bush DID underplay the threat of terrorism, and I have provided the evidence.
by Steelhamster on Tue Oct 26, 04 1:41pm [+]

Going to Afghanistan to avenge the deaths of 3,000 people, and engaging in preemptive action in Iraq, is not underplaying the threat of terrorism, steel.
by WalterPeck_EPA on Tue Oct 26, 04 7:20pm [+]

If you listen very closely, WalterPeck, really really close, you will hear a thump thump thump noise...

...thats the sound of me hitting my head against the computer screen.

None of the reasons you gave was the reason for the war on Iraq. Iraq was no threat to the US or any other country currently engaged there, nor was there any link between Bin Laden and Saddam.

The only link of any consuquence you should be worrying about when it comes to Bin Laden is the Bush families links to the whole Bin Laden family.

I understand you dont like hearing things that may shake your world view of things, but sometimes, if it looks like a duck and it walks like a duck and qucks like a duck... its a DUCK!
by Steelhamster on Wed Oct 27, 04 8:49am [+]

Kerry treats Terrorism like a crime, thinking law enforcement can take care of it. Which is wholey inadequte for the job. The only way to tackle terrorism is to use military force.
by Dragonman657 on Mon Dec 19, 05 12:55pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved