user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
I am not saying Kerry or Gore would have done better, but I think it is a bit much him saying he is the best man for the job Landing on that aircraft carrier did it for me
"Landing on that aircraft carrier did it for me" I've met a couple of other people who've said that. Why exactly did that "do it" for you? I'm not trying to start an argument; just curious.
I find it suggestive and a sign of bad taste Landing on a carrier means nothing compared to the soldiers who are patrolling IN Iraq, day in day out. To me it seemed he was trying to lead people to believe that there was no real distinction between him and the soldiers doing their job. If he had landed in Bagdad, even if there had been the thightest security possible and the chances of anything happening practicaly nill, THAT I would have called a strong symbolic message But landing a few hundred miles from the coast, somewhere in the Arabian Gulf and having the gall to step out like Tome Cruise and say the war is over SAD It became nothing more than a photo-opp
Very well stated indeed Merovingian...
|
|