search this site: search the web:

WHY IS THE WESTERN WORLD IN AN UPROAR OVER IRAN OBTAINING NUCLEAR WEAPONS WHEN ISRAEL (70 UN RESOLUTIONS AGAINST IT) HAS A STOCKADE OF NUKES?

choices : political :

WHY IS THE WESTERN WORLD IN AN UPROAR OVER IRAN OBTAINING NUCLEAR WEAPONS WHEN ISRAEL (70 UN RESOLUTIONS AGAINST IT) HAS A STOCKADE OF NUKES?


[+] serious ballot by CouchGnome
created Tue Nov 23, 04

Jewish controlled media
Iran is dangerous
Iran shouldn't be allowed to defend itself from zionists
only zionists should have nuclear weapons
Iran is too unstable for nukes
Iran should be allowed to protect itself from US/Israel

Ballot #59763 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:
Register to submit comments
You may still vote without registration

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:








similiar ballots:
96315. If Iran did get nuclear weapons, would they give such weapons to terrorists?
95762. how many nuclear weapons does Israel have?
111807. is it really such a bad thing if iran has nuclear weapons?
115980. Israel Has Nuclear Weapons, Should We Invade Them?
64904. Would you support the invasion of Iran if nuclear weapons are being developed?
112781. Would military action prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons?
87831. Iran kicks out inspectors and continues to build nuclear weapons, UN response is to hope everything turns out ok, think this is a good strategy?
70965. Which is worse for the world as we know it: the advent of nuclear weapons, or the use of money?
134755. Do The Five Nuclear Weapon Countries Have Exclusive Rights To Possess Nuclear Weapons?
13096. Did you know Israel is in violation of 68 UN security council resolutions?




whatisit? - smilesheet - quick ref. - hel.lo v.0.01

COMMENTS:
I would say Iran is dangerous, but it appears to me that most countries that have them are dangerous as well.
by ABC on Tue Nov 23, 04 2:39pm [+]

Good question. The UN has not sanctioned a nation more than Israel without taking some kind of action. At least the UN could try to put sanctions on the Jews. The US is like Israel's little bitch. Why we support them so unequivocally is beyond me. Maybe, just maybe, Bush will grow a pair before 08 and tell them to fuck off.

If I was viceroy of Iran I would totally get nukes. Look how much nicer the world is to Israel, the US, Russia, China, India, Pakistan, and South Africa. Everything is about diplomacy with those nations, but Iraq no nukes = both the living hell out of them.
by progressivepolitics on Tue Nov 23, 04 2:57pm [+]

All the religious nutjobs want to help Israel stay alive, because the bible says it's necessary for the coming war of Armageddon. Bible prophesy is an important part of the modern geo-political situation.
by um__yeah on Tue Nov 23, 04 2:58pm [+]

wawawa someone needs to be banned
by confidentconservativ on Tue Nov 23, 04 3:50pm [+]

Because israel is a democratic nation with good relations with the US, iran is a fundamentalist nation that wants to convert or kill all heathens as a part of their national policy.

Same reason we had no problem with britian developing nukes, but we were a little concerend when the USSR did.
by herzog on Tue Nov 23, 04 7:02pm [+]

iran is a fundamentalist nation that wants to convert or kill all heathens as a part of their national policy.

Where does it say that?
by cretin_slap on Wed Nov 24, 04 4:18am [+]

Cretin: would like you to be a jew in iran? Answer me that.

Or would you like to be an israeli living next to a nuclear armed iran?
by herzog on Wed Nov 24, 04 9:40am [+]

Why, why, why is okay for there to be a nuclear armed Israel, but your panties are in a bunch about Iran. Has any nation used nukes? What about Mutually Assured Destruction? That was one of Reagan's big theories. Now....
by progressivepolitics on Wed Nov 24, 04 9:36pm [+]

iran is a fundamentalist nation that wants to convert or kill all heathens as a part of their national policy.

Where can I find evidence that Iran's leaders said this, her-blog? I had a look on the internet, but came up empty. Please tell me who said it, and give me a reference.
by cretin_slap on Thu Nov 25, 04 6:52am [+]

Israel really has no choice but to have them. Just look at their position. Almost or every neighboring country considers them their enemy and many of them are developing or already have nuclear weapons. It is necessary for their survival to have them, being in such close range.
by ceejjj on Fri Feb 25, 05 3:09pm [+]

Israel is a stable and responsible nation in an unstable region. Would any country want to be in their position and not have them?
by ceejjj on Fri Feb 25, 05 3:13pm [+]

"Or would you like to be an israeli living next to a nuclear armed iran?" -- herzog

As much as I'd like to be an Iranian living next to a nuclear-armed Israel.
by Counciltucky on Thu Jun 09, 05 11:36pm [+]





About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | © 2002-2009 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved