search this site: search the web:
Anybody can vote, registered or not!

THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION PAID A COMMENTATOR TO PROMOTE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND. IS THIS PROOF OF CONSERVATIVE MANIPULATION OF THE MEDIA?

user ballots

political :

THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION PAID A COMMENTATOR TO PROMOTE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND. IS THIS PROOF OF CONSERVATIVE MANIPULATION OF THE MEDIA?


[+] serious ballot by xxxxxxxx
created Fri Jan 07, 05

(By Greg Toppo, USA Today)

(Jan. 7) - Seeking to build support among black families for its education reform law, the Bush administration paid a prominent black pundit $240,000 to promote the law on his nationally syndicated television show and to urge other black journalists to do the same.

The campaign, part of an effort to promote No Child Left Behind (NCLB), required commentator Armstrong Williams "to regularly comment on NCLB during the course of his broadcasts," and to interview Education Secretary Rod Paige for TV and radio spots that aired during the show in 2004.

Williams said Thursday he understands that critics could find the arrangement unethical, but "I wanted to do it because it's something I believe in."

The top Democrat on the House Education Committee, Rep. George Miller of California, called the contract "a very questionable use of taxpayers' money" that is "probably illegal." He said he will ask his Republican counterpart to join him in requesting an investigation.

The contract, detailed in documents obtained by USA TODAY through a Freedom of Information Act request, also shows that the Education Department, through the Ketchum public relations firm, arranged with Williams to use contacts with America's Black Forum, a group of black broadcast journalists, "to encourage the producers to periodically address" NCLB. He persuaded radio and TV personality Steve Harvey to invite Paige onto his show twice. Harvey's manager, Rushion McDonald, confirmed the appearances.

Williams said he does not recall disclosing the contract to audiences on the air but told colleagues about it when urging them to promote NCLB.

"I respect Mr. Williams' statement that this is something he believes in," said Bob Steele, a media ethics expert at The Poynter Institute for Media Studies. "But I would suggest that his commitment to that belief is best exercised through his excellent professional work rather than through contractual obligations with outsiders who are, quite clearly, trying to influence content."

The contract may be illegal "because Congress has prohibited propaganda," or any sort of lobbying for programs funded by the government, said Melanie Sloan of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. "And it's propaganda."

White House spokesman Trent Duffy said he couldn't comment because the White House is not involved in departments' contracts.

Ketchum referred questions to the Education Department, whose spokesman, John Gibbons, said the contract followed standard government procedures. He said there are no plans to continue with "similar outreach."

Williams' contract was part of a $1 million deal with Ketchum that produced "video news releases" designed to look like news reports. The Bush administration used similar releases last year to promote its Medicare prescription drug plan, prompting a scolding from the Government Accountability Office, which called them an illegal use of taxpayers' dollars.

Williams, 45, a former aide to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, is one of the top black conservative voices in the nation. He hosts The Right Side on TV and radio, and writes op-ed pieces for newspapers, including USA TODAY, while running a public relations firm, Graham Williams Group.

Yes.
The media and neocons have always been in bed together.
Liberals manipulate the media just as much


Ballot #64094 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
62324. Is Bush’s reelection proof that the media has a more conservative bias?
100835. READ ALL ABOUT IT! -BUSH A RAPIST/MURDERER? MORE PROOF OF US MEDIA COVER-UP
80388. If Gandhi were living in today's US, how would the Bush administration and neocon-dominated media treat him?
92581. Which of the economic "accomplishments" of the fiscally conservative Bush Administration is your favorite?
111458. Is this an example of conservative bias in the media?
112056. Is this another example of conservative bias in the media?
61446. Why is it that when CBS, a neutral media source, makes an honest mistake about George W. Bush, it's because "the media is liberal" ...
76206. Which conservative Republican was, as a child, deeply affected by being beaten up by a Democratic girl?
57652. Why is it that, in politics and media, the idea of being a conservative is celebrated, but the idea of being a liberal is villified?
92316. Did Bush Administration staffers leak the Iran invasion plan because they fear Bush has gone off his rocker?


COMMENTS:
If he believed in the program so much, then why not do the "ads" for nothing? I believe in childrens' advocacy, and I don't take a dime for it. Or maybe I've been missing the point...
by Truthseeker013 on Fri Jan 07, 05 5:34pm [+]

hmm I wonder who else has been paid off! I love our president, he makes me so proud to be American (sarcasm)
by Duckhead on Fri Jan 07, 05 5:36pm [+]

This should shut up anyone who actually believes the "liberal media" myth.
by xxxxxxxx on Fri Jan 07, 05 6:00pm [+]

That's the least of our problems. George and his fellow apocolyptic reborns are establishing a U.S. presence in the middle east because they are preparing for the end of days. Bush lackies have been sent to various "literal" biblical scholars in order to get a take on where the U.S. should be positioned for the apocolypse. We are now a theocracy.
by elvislennon on Fri Jan 07, 05 6:18pm [+]

One guy supports one conservative issue and this negates the hundreds who support liberal issues for free?
by herzog on Fri Jan 07, 05 7:35pm [+]

Seems if the media really were conservative, as you claim, then they wouldn't have to pay to get them to say nice things about bush.
by herzog on Fri Jan 07, 05 7:50pm [+]

The viability of governmental policy should not be mediated by advertising.
by Applerod on Fri Jan 07, 05 10:20pm [+]

good point herzog
by RawIron on Sat Jan 08, 05 12:28am [+]

Actually herzog, your point is moot. Fact of the matter is, the Bush Administration is using taxpayer money to influence what's said on the radio. This is a fact -- an undisputable fact. And the media isn't liberal -- if the media was liberal, Dems would've easily won back the White House as well as gained control of the Senate. Just because conservative radio hosts say the media is liberal doesn't make it liberal.
by xxxxxxxx on Sat Jan 08, 05 1:06am [+]

No, my point is not moot.

Do you have to pay your friends to say something nice about you? Is that a standard practice around the world? Of course not. The only time you'd have to pay someone to say something nice about you is if they are opposed to you under normal circumstances. You claim the media is conservative and as evidence you present the fact that bush has to pay for good publicity.
by herzog on Sat Jan 08, 05 1:46am [+]

Actually your point is, indeed, moot.

He's a commentator, he's paid for his opinion, and the government is paying to influence his opinion. The media is generally conservative -- this is true. And yes, it's evidenced by the fact that the conservatives are clearly influencing the media in this incident -- and one has to ask, is this an isolated incident?

With taxpayer money, on top of that.

Besides, he paid an openly conservative commentator -- that nullifies any liberal media argument you could possibly conjure.
by xxxxxxxx on Sat Jan 08, 05 2:21pm [+]

One more incidence os corruption and illegal/ unethical behaviour.
by Cathexis on Mon Jan 10, 05 11:01am [+]

Republicans are a bunch of damn crooks.
by cranky on Mon Jan 10, 05 1:50pm [+]

I may have missed something but I thought Herzog was a Republican? I recall him complaining that the govnt should NOT have the right to spend HIS money on any type of govnt assistance or charity (the specific example I believe was regarding a quadrapalgic)
But Herzog you dont mind the Govnt spending Your money on ideological propaganda?
by Duckhead on Mon Jan 10, 05 5:11pm [+]

Yes, Duckhead, but herzog also claims to be a political non-conformist because he's a conservative, but then he said in a different ballot that he goes to a school where the students tend to lean conservative.
by xxxxxxxx on Wed Jan 12, 05 12:53am [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved