user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
If he believed in the program so much, then why not do the "ads" for nothing? I believe in childrens' advocacy, and I don't take a dime for it. Or maybe I've been missing the point...
hmm I wonder who else has been paid off! I love our president, he makes me so proud to be American (sarcasm)
This should shut up anyone who actually believes the "liberal media" myth.
That's the least of our problems. George and his fellow apocolyptic reborns are establishing a U.S. presence in the middle east because they are preparing for the end of days. Bush lackies have been sent to various "literal" biblical scholars in order to get a take on where the U.S. should be positioned for the apocolypse. We are now a theocracy.
One guy supports one conservative issue and this negates the hundreds who support liberal issues for free?
Seems if the media really were conservative, as you claim, then they wouldn't have to pay to get them to say nice things about bush.
The viability of governmental policy should not be mediated by advertising.
good point herzog
Actually herzog, your point is moot. Fact of the matter is, the Bush Administration is using taxpayer money to influence what's said on the radio. This is a fact -- an undisputable fact. And the media isn't liberal -- if the media was liberal, Dems would've easily won back the White House as well as gained control of the Senate. Just because conservative radio hosts say the media is liberal doesn't make it liberal.
No, my point is not moot. Do you have to pay your friends to say something nice about you? Is that a standard practice around the world? Of course not. The only time you'd have to pay someone to say something nice about you is if they are opposed to you under normal circumstances. You claim the media is conservative and as evidence you present the fact that bush has to pay for good publicity.
Actually your point is, indeed, moot. He's a commentator, he's paid for his opinion, and the government is paying to influence his opinion. The media is generally conservative -- this is true. And yes, it's evidenced by the fact that the conservatives are clearly influencing the media in this incident -- and one has to ask, is this an isolated incident? With taxpayer money, on top of that. Besides, he paid an openly conservative commentator -- that nullifies any liberal media argument you could possibly conjure.
One more incidence os corruption and illegal/ unethical behaviour.
Republicans are a bunch of damn crooks.
I may have missed something but I thought Herzog was a Republican? I recall him complaining that the govnt should NOT have the right to spend HIS money on any type of govnt assistance or charity (the specific example I believe was regarding a quadrapalgic) But Herzog you dont mind the Govnt spending Your money on ideological propaganda?
Yes, Duckhead, but herzog also claims to be a political non-conformist because he's a conservative, but then he said in a different ballot that he goes to a school where the students tend to lean conservative.
|
|