user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Interesting question. I'd say that you aren't criminally liable, as the mother was committing a criminal act when she died. Of course, I'm just a mathematician with a thing for Jennifer Connelly, so you MIGHT want to consult an actual lawyer.
Yeah, but at least here, for an entity to be protected by civil law they got to have juridic personality. If an unborn child has juridic personality, then he's a separate entity from his mother-to-be, and isn't legally bound by her actions.
You would be arrested--arrested in the sense that the police would stop you from going about your business and take you in for questioning. If wittnesses and film backed up your story you'd be a free man freedom-fries. Why? You didn't kill the child, she did, by putting the child in the situation--like an intoxicated driver who kills his passenger. If she lived and the baby died she would be prosecuted for murder.
I gather, from the question, that the woman isn't 'showing' - so how could you possibly know she was pregnant? It's the equivalent of stuffing a baby into a backpack, taping his/her mouth shut, and committing the same robbery.
You ought to be rewarded for shooting a criminal, so I'd have to go with 'no' on this one.
~ What he said.
|
|