SINCE BUSH SR. SOLD IRAQ WMD’S, WHY ISN’T OUR CURRENT PRESIDENT CALLING HIM A TERRORIST? [+] ballot by RobinGaylord created Sat Jan 22, 05 A lot of the people I know, that at first supported the war in Iraq, believed that Saddam had WMD’s because he bought them from the US shortly before he invaded Iran. Since Bush’s daddy was in office back then it would make sense that Bush Jr. would have personal knowledge of what weapons Iraq has and if the U.N. could only account for a few of the ones his daddy sold him then of course Saddam must’ve still had them. But he didn’t still have them, turns out that the people that used this ‘logic’ didn’t account for the fact that he did use most of the weapons we sold him on the Kurds, Iranians and American soldiers. But doesn’t selling these weapons to a terrorist make you a terrorist too? He had committed terrorist acts before Bush Sr. sold them to him so he knew he was aiding a known terrorist. Am I the only one that is bothered by the fact that the son of a terrorist is in office leading of all things a War on Terror right now? If we led a war against Iraq because we thought that Saddam might sell WMD’s to Bin Laden, then why do we treat the Bush family any better than Saddam Hussein, after all Saddam didn’t sell WMD’s to any other terrorists and Bush Sr. did. Since Bush Sr. sold Iraq WMD’s, why isn’t our current President calling him a terrorist? That family enjoys many undeserved privileges. It’s another flaw in the Bush doctrine. because he's sick Hypocrisy Dubya's just a terrorist with a nice suit. ANOTHER slanted ballot Ballot #65346 : SEE RESULTS Comment: show your vote with comment?

v 2.0

© BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank: