user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
It's a fact of journalism Larry, blood sells. The more blood the better. I suppose when you think about it blood sells because we, the people, want to read or hear about it. Every death is sad but only tragic deaths sell.
by B_P on Tue Feb 08, 05 9:04am
[+]
sadly enough, i think the media focuses more on deaths of people who were of higer status than say an iraqi civilian or an Asian villager. 50 people could die in a car bomb explosion and the news will dedicate 30 seconds to that story. but if God forbid, the dude who runs Burger King died, I'm sure he'd get a one hour special. It's unfortunate and unfair but that's the way it works a lot of the time. Good ballot, larry.
higher*
I agree...each life is important.
by mojo on Tue Feb 08, 05 9:11am
[+]
Im reading a book at the moment called " Birdsong", about the horrors of the first world war, and to be honest it puts the loss of a few marines in Iraq into perspective. Compare that to 50 or 60 THOUSAND dying in ONE day at the battle of the Somme. Imagine what news THAT would make nowadays!
I know king, but it was not instant information as it is now. ww1 and 2, may have had different outcome if they did.
I agree that each life is just as important. Unfortunately the media has no feelings and just goes after the bigger better stories for their pocketbooks.
What would you prefer, innocent civilians killed in Iraq by their despotic leaders for 100s of years. Or a war which will see civilians die in collateral damage and civil unrest for 10 years. Even if it means killing people you still have to do the right thing.
|
|