search this site: search the web:
Vote free or die!

DOES NEWS COVERAGE ABOUT SOMETHING BAD THAT A PERSON HAS DONE, CONSTITUTE 'BIASED' REPORTING?

user ballots

advice : news related :

DOES NEWS COVERAGE ABOUT SOMETHING BAD THAT A PERSON HAS DONE, CONSTITUTE 'BIASED' REPORTING?


[+] ballot by mojo
created Fri Mar 11, 05

I've heard the reporting on Bush's mis-statements about weapons of mass destruction referred to as 'biased'. If that is the case, was the exhaustive Clinton/Lewinsky coverage also 'biased'?

Just wondering.

Yes, we only want good news about our public figures.
Yes, but only if it's bad news about a Republican.
No - facts are facts, however unpleasant, and Joe Q. Public has the right to know them.


Ballot #69562 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









COMMENTS:
These days any truth told about Karl Rove's little monkey is smeared as biased.
by cranky on Fri Mar 11, 05 8:12am [+]

As long as it's accurate, substantiated, and it's disproportionately reported.
by herzog on Fri Mar 11, 05 10:28am [+]

*isn't*
by herzog on Fri Mar 11, 05 10:29am [+]

I think the closest thing we have to non-biased is Tim Russert, he prepares you for one question usually knowing what your response will be, then he lets you say it, then throws up a video of you contradicting yourself. It doesnt matter if you are a Democrat, Republican, KKK Clansman or a Preacher, he seems to make people eat their own words very often, but besides him I think *most* others are biased.
by Duckhead on Fri Mar 11, 05 11:25am [+]

Yeah, I totally agree about Tim Russert.
by mojo on Fri Mar 11, 05 11:56am [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved