SHOULD THE USA GET OUT OF THE U.N. AND THEN THROW THE U.N. OUT OF THE USA?

search this site: search the web:

Do you like half baked websites? You'll love it here! Sign up now!

SHOULD THE USA GET OUT OF THE U.N. AND THEN THROW THE U.N. OUT OF THE USA?

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

choices : SHOULD THE USA GET OUT OF THE U.N. AND THEN THROW THE U.N. OUT OF THE USA?

[+] serious ballot by sspphoto
created Sun May 08, 05
Should that be done? Consider the foreign anti-American politics that have corrupted the U.N. for decades. Has the U.N. alledgedly become a staging area for such crimes as money laundering, drug trafficking, a base for international guerrillas, a.k.a. "terrorists" planning future attacks on humanity? Has all the above made the U.N. obsolete? The USA has been the main financial supporter of the UN since its inception in 1943 and should that be considered money flushed down the toilet? For all the above plus much more, should the USA get out of the U.N. and then throw the U.N. out of the USA? You decide!

Yes
No
Yes unless the U.N. cleans up its act.

Ballot #73070 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

similiar ballots:
25300. Did you ever throw anything down the sewer?
114048. What situations are you most likely to throw poo in?
103717. What should be done with people who throw their gum on the ground?
122936. Hole In Sock: How Big Before You Throw It Away?
128501. Worst food to "throw up"?
55726. If Americans throw rice at weddings
95690. Would it be fun to throw 1,000 buckets of KFC at a PETA protest?
118763. Are you going to throw a party on January 20, 2009?
127124. Would you throw a CINDERBLOCK off the top of a tall building for $1,000,000
127126. What would be the FUNNIEST thing to throw into a tornado?

COMMENTS:
Based on the description I am not sure if you are talking about UN or the CIA. So, what are you talking about?

by johan_moritz on Sun May 08, 05 11:14am [+]

Well, I'd be inclined to agree with you, if not for one thing. The U.S. is presently two years in abeyance on its membership dues. And that's ONLY because one of the liberals that conservatives love to hate, one Ted Turner, PAID those dues OUT OF POCKET two years ago. If you don't believe me, look it up. You can't claim to be a member of a club, not pay your dues, then insist on enforcement and revamping of the rules.

by Truthseeker013 on Sun May 08, 05 11:30am [+]

One thing conservatives fail to understand is that the UN was created essentially based on the rules and guidelines that the USA wanted. The current debate is nothing more than a distraction and a convenient punching bag.

by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Sun May 08, 05 11:40am [+]

Simple answer: No. The United Nations is a forum (however flawed) that sometimes provides the only connection between adversary nation: the only place where they can talk. And there may come a time in our extremely volatile world where the U.N. will help prevent a nuclear catastrophy.

Does the U.N. need some reformation. Yes, but throwing the baby out with the bath water doesn't make sense to me.

Interesting Ballot. Thanks.

by xxxxxxxx on Sun May 08, 05 1:11pm [+]

Based only on what you put I would say yes, however I think that the exposure some of those people get to America might change their minds.

Anyways the UN wouldn't be any less of those things if they were in Brussels, Khartoum, or Jakarta.

by xxxxxxxx on Sun May 08, 05 2:14pm [+]

i HAVE FRIENDS THAT WORKED IN THE UN, IT'S COOL--NOT PERFECT, BUT OK.

by elvislennon on Sun May 08, 05 3:26pm [+]

I think the UN serves a very important purpose and we need to remember that FDR played a very large part in its creation. The US should work harder to have a better relationship with the UN and the UN should try harder to be more fair to the USA.

by patch22us on Sun May 08, 05 4:33pm [+]

Fiddle: the US also created the articles of confederation. So we don't get everything right on the first try, it's time to do with those pieces of garbage: have a bunch of americans sit down and figure out a system that works, taking into account the previous mistakes.

by herzog on Mon May 09, 05 4:01pm [+]

What griffon007 said.

by Cathexis on Mon May 09, 05 4:30pm [+]

Yeah, what Griffon said.

by cranky on Mon May 09, 05 4:43pm [+]

Get rid of the UN. That was another of FDR's HUGE blunders.

by thc2883 on Tue May 10, 05 7:39am [+]

The UN is obsolete as the US and UK have demonstrated.
What is needed is a new alliance.
I reckon the EU, USA, Japan, Russia, Canada, Australia, Israel and Iraq would make a good team.
Like to see China or N korea pick a fight with that alliance.

by Fyndhorn on Tue May 10, 05 10:30am [+]

RE: Based on the description I am not sure if you are talking about UN or the CIA. So, what are you talking about?
by johan_moritz on May 08, 2005

Response:
I am talking about BOTH of them!

by sspphoto on Tue May 17, 05 11:54pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |