user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Public health is more important, IMO. After all, people with pools are required by law to enclose them to prevent drownings. This doesn't seem so different. I think they should be notified, told to clean up their pool within, say, 72 hours, then face charges if they fail to do so.
by mojo on Sat Jun 18, 05 1:58pm
[+]
I think there always needs to be a careful examination of the facts and the risks of violating privacy issues. So, caution is always advised. This situation though, seems pretty clear cut. Interesting ballot, herzog.
I see this as a privacy issue ONLY if someone's doing something in their backyard that they really SHOULDN'T be doing. My motto is, "If you have nothing to hide, open the door."
I am leaning towards the public health on this issue. I don't think that there is a constitutional right to privacy. My belief is that that was created out of whole cloth. I think other information would be helpful like, can police use helicopters to find pot? I think though that it is probably a waste of resources. There seems that there would be a more cost effective way to do this. And what if as a result someone is found to be storing gasoline a little improperly for example. Now that I have thought about it I think it is a bad idea.
Hadn't even thought of the waste of resources. As inter_regnum says, perhaps it's a bad idea.
by mojo on Sat Jun 18, 05 6:11pm
[+]
|
|