COMMENTS:
uh, no!!
Only if they've got a floppy c*ck.
not as long as there are people who can't afford life saving medications and treatments and are not getting help
why should taxpayers have to foot the bill for some guys erection
Poor people can't have sex?
So, for example, a veteran on welfare who needs viagra so he can have sex with his wife shouldn't get it?
when the goverment is cutting benifits for children and others, no , if they should not get viagra,
give me a break,
why should taxpayers who are working an paying taxes, and many would not even beable to afford viagra for themselves, but they could leave their job and get it free, no. that's not right
LOWER INCOME PEOPLE CAN NOT HAVE SEX? BECAUSE MANY COULD NOT AFFORD VIAGRA AND THE GOVERMENT IS NOT HELPING THEM OUT, DON'T YOU SEE HOW WRONG IT IS TO EXPECT THE TAXPAYERS TO HAVE TO PAY FOR AN ERECTION?
everyone wants the goverment out of our private lives, but it's ok for them to get involved I guess when it's something that feels so good
If you can't buy an erection or get one on your own, tough turkey.
If that veteran became impotent because of something military related,yes he should get it
The govmt is cutting benefits because they think tax cuts for the rich and paying for a needless war are more important. (250 billion, now? that could help a lot of people get medication)
Sorry, I don't agree that poor people should be treated differently just because they are on welfare. Everyone deserves to have as happy a life as possible.
Instead of having a knee jerk reaction to this ballot, think of possible circumstances where it might be a bad thing to do.
Not all people on welfare want to be there. An erection problem is just as much a problem as depression, mental problems etc. If your gonna start denying treatments based on 'it's not life threatening' you might as well stop treating everything else. For anyone on welfare sex is probably the highlight of the week.
do something to change the way goverement gets money, but why when a working person can not afford viagra for himself and will not get help from the goverment, have to pay taxes for someone else to get an erection. you say poor people should be treated differently, the working person is treated different, because he is not able to get viagra but a poor person can, put it in perspective, not knee jerking, its logical, by the way those lower income working people , are below the poverty line, but no one is giving them viagra
I'd rather my taxes go to help some poor sod with a limp d*ck than to send young kids out to die.
so would I ic, but until the goverment changes, why should they get a hard on when a person working can't, you guys don't really address the problem, you come up with your lame, I'd rather give this or that. Until the system is changed, it's either viagra for all or viagra for nobody
and yes, a childs health is more important than a hard on , like it or not, that's how it is. In ny state they have a budget , when they go over, benifits are cut, meaning because viagra was given to people, perhaps no money would be available for say prenatal care.
enough babies will still be conceived by those with no erection problem to make prenatal care necessary, before you twist that and take away from the subject matter.
Prvt Message to InternalColonel off larrynelmira
... I think you are so wrong, you do not have all the answers, and really tired of yours and fiddlefaddles self righteous attitude,
.... First off, I expressed my opinion, you expressed yours, you messaged me a shitty message!
I've got as much right to make my comments sound how I like, as much as you have to sound like a whining cry_baby. It's not the first time you've done this shit with me, do it again and I may forget you are a pup.
Fiddle: so the government not paying for you to do something is the same as saying you can't do it? So by the that logic, the government doesn't buy poor people clothing, therefore the poor aren't allowed to have clothes. Interesting, if skewed logic.
I thought I was the kid, I meant to put in public but went to your private, but you told on me, big deal IC,
dont' call me son, ever, and well we are giving erections to every tom dick and harry, children are being deprived of health care.
Yeah OK son, I try not to answer your comments on the ballots as when your Jeckle & Hyde syndrome wears off you tend to delete your comments.
Truthseeker is right!! tough turkey!!!!
its in full on your public page for everyone to see, and I'm not changing my comments or mind about what I said, still stand by it
have not deleted anything on this ballot and reason I have deleted in the past because some all knowing people say I have poor analogies , but not listening to those people anymore either, so don't fear, my comments will not be deleted
Yeah but you deleted my messages to you though. If this was your ballot it would be gone by now.
I always delete my public messages, and I could delete my comments if I choose to here, but won't.
viagra is not something that is needed, and again people who work don't get it free but can't afford, why should people who do not work get it, and all of those people, regardless of what you have heard, are not out of work because they can not find jobs or are disabled, they just don't want to work, why is it so politically incorrect for people to admit, some people are just lazy
See my earlier comment 'NOT ALL people on welfare want to be there' some are just lazy. Do you read these comments before you start your knee jerk reactions?
Fiddle also has a right to express his opinion, just cos it doesn't match yours we're 'self rightous' and you're 'sick of us' lol. Just what is going on in that head of yours?
No - unless women on welfare are given hormones for menopause. Are they??
by mojo on Thu Jun 30, 05 7:40pm
[+]
and I have right to mine, and I expressed, not sorry I did either, and just as I've been told by you and fiddle both, that you are tired of me playing the victim, I have the right to say I am sick of the opinion of you two
You have every right to your opinion, I couldn't care less what they are and I didn't pass comment about them.You attacked me, you obviously care about mine and that they don't match yours. A rather unhealthy hang up methinks.
I think that people with life-threatening conditions should be given treatment before people with sexual disfunction.
That's what Larry is saying, right?
I also have a problem, as a taxpayer, with paying for that - when the cost of my own health insurance is bankrupting me.
by mojo on Thu Jun 30, 05 7:49pm
[+]
I'm sure they are in land of utopia mojo, but in usa, who knows ,when it comes to taking care of america's health issues , we have the most lop sided system on the planet, poor can get viagra but working class struggling people can't even get help to pay for a life or death surgery or medication
Yeah, you have every right to tell me you're sick of me, just like I have every right to say you're a whining cry-baby. But I wouldn't be so rude and immature to do so unless challenged first. End of discussion sonny :o)
sorry, posted mine as you were writting yours I guess
You better hope Larry agrees with it Mojo. Otherwise he'll send you a shitty message. He's in hyde mode tonight.
this cry baby cares more about serious illness and lack of coverage for that, than a 20 minutes of it feeels sooo goooood. very selfish if you want my opinion, which of course you don't
I would never send mojo a shitty comment
okay, tempers are flaring here. take it easy, this is a ballot about viagra after all, so no need to let the exchange get heated "up"
this is a tough one. in theory, viagra is not a mandatory life-saving drug. however, a person on welfare should not be penalized just becasue they are in need of public assistance.
i think they should be entitled to receive it. but, i also think the dr's need to be particularly vigilant that it is a necessity and not over-prescribe it just because some guy thinks it will give him harder wood.
viagra, though i've never used it, is misunderstood because many people assume it gives a guy and instant and lasting erection. it does not.
if they guy needs it do to erectile dysfuction, then he should be able to get it, even if he is on welfare.
What seems to be getting overlooked here is that most people with erectile dysfunction generally suffer from other disabilities which create the problem in the first place, such as, depression and other mental dissorders. these people are much more likely to be on welfare anyway. Also what is the comparative cost between a few viagra and, say, an operation?
Most people don`t seem to mind that it costs a lot more for a bunch of wasters and mental defectives to hold an ELECTION.
And yes how did observer get such a fast rating. I smell a rat. Or at least an alias. Could be wrong but thats a lot of karma in a very short time!
most of the new users are on a fast track I've noticed, I think it's easier to make it to knight than it was in our day
a working person without insurance should not be penalized either, but many can not afford to buy viagra, if you want to make sure everyone has an erection, make it free for all
I also don't think people who live in countries with universal health care are able to understand the Dilemma that is going on in america regarding health care and priorities.
No one should have anything paid for by welfare AKA the plundered wealth of others.
sorry to change the subject but I don't think it could be that much easier. Guy_Cabbelero became a member on June 8th and is now Grand Master Knight.. that's what I am! And I've been that forever!! I get good karma pretty darn often, why the hell am I staying at the same status for months and some new person comes along and flies right past me??
sflibra, the way it was explained to me is that it is not just about getting karma and, that it is easier to get to the master or grand master knight level, but then you are at that level for quite a while. i'm already a master knight and even though i've gotten tons of good karma, i've actually gotten more since becoming master kight, but am still at that level. not sure if i was given correct information. i barely notice anyway and don't put much stock in titles or levels.
OKAY, ALREADY! First, what did you welfare people do before Viagra, before cell phones, etc? Second, re fast rating: there's no rat! no alias!. Yes, Karma (just lucky, I guess.) Don't forget to ask Granpa how he and Gran manage without Viagra. They do, and just fine.
I have been stuck at knight forever too, and after these comments sure I will stay here a lot longer, although I did make it to lord for a day, the karma rating is no big deal for me either,
I guess it really doesn't to me either. I think it's more the unfairness that bothers me.. that's just a Libra thing.
No, we wouldn't want to help them breed.
All I can say is i hope that none of the people against this suffer a breakdown which leaves them incapable of working and sexualy comromised and then yyou can sit in your lonely isolation and not even have the comfort of feeling sorry for yourselves. Just so you know larry viagra isnt free on our health care system. but it is partialy subsidised. One thing I will never be able to understand about the logic that says "hey why should we pay taxes for these losers" is the simple fact that inamerica there is no real need to tax anyone at all. Theres enough money coming in to make it pointless. I know some people wont accept that and I really cant be bothered to go looking for the information but it is true whether you accept it or not.
And observer I feel I owe you an apology. It does appear that high ratings are easier to obtain than they used to be. It also depends whos rated you.
I'm unemployed and I don't know what I'd do if I couldn't sit around masturbating all day.
|
