search this site: search the web:

SHOULD GOVERNMENTS WITH A FUNDAMENTALIST BASE HAVE ACCESS TO NUCLEAR WEAPONRY?

advice : news related :

SHOULD GOVERNMENTS WITH A FUNDAMENTALIST BASE HAVE ACCESS TO NUCLEAR WEAPONRY?


[+] ballot by Steelhamster
created Fri Jul 01, 05

There are countries around the world that are reliant on the fundamentalist vote and as such could be seen as a threat to the world. Should they have access to potentially deadly nuclear arms?

Yes
No
Other (Please Comment)

Ballot #76434 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:
Register to submit comments
You may still vote without registration

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:








similiar ballots:
73914. ETHICAL DILEMMA: You play baseball for a fundamentalist Christian organization. Your coach tells you to "steal" a base. NOW WHAT???
134755. Do The Five Nuclear Weapon Countries Have Exclusive Rights To Possess Nuclear Weapons?
94465. Will Fundamentalist Christians get sex in heaven?
122426. Men : Does fundamentalist Mormonism appealing to you?
94293. Would you support a christian fundamentalist regime?
97431. Is God proud of the bigotry many fundamentalist Christians have toward...
103161. Why do Fundamentalist Christians defend Israel?
133512. Do fundamentalist Christians believe that the UNIVERSE is 6,000 to 10,000 years old?
73626. In America today, can you really be a conservative without being a fundamentalist Christian?
14868. MTV2 or MTV BASE or MTV HITS




whatisit? - smilesheet - quick ref. - hel.lo v.0.01

COMMENTS:
Does this also apply to communist fundamentalists like the starving N.Koreans, or are you limiting this to religion?

No country should have nukes.
by JohnnyReb on Fri Jul 01, 05 11:00pm [+]

yeah, I agree, no country should have nukes, wish somehow that could be taken care of
by larrynelmira on Fri Jul 01, 05 11:18pm [+]

Would our current American government count as having a "fundamentalist base?" Might well, eh.

Do we want these right-wing fundamentalists in control of our nukes. Well, I'm afraid they already are, and I'm against it. Voted the bastids out once and it didn't count. What are we to do?
by griffon007 on Fri Jul 01, 05 11:29pm [+]

I'm just saying that fundamentalism isnt limited to religion.

by JohnnyReb on Fri Jul 01, 05 11:30pm [+]

No they shouldn`t

End in A?
by mobsie666 on Sat Jul 02, 05 12:30am [+]

They do,there is a dossier on it somewhere in Downing Street... guess we shall be invading any_____ minute____ NOW!
by Steelhamster on Sat Jul 02, 05 12:45am [+]

Why not? The world is going to hell anyway?
by Banucha on Sat Jul 02, 05 7:20am [+]

I'll take the bait, the United States does not have what you can term a 'fundamentalist base' group of people, you can't say that about the majority of people in this country who believe in religion, that's completely perposterous.
by jappy on Sat Jul 02, 05 9:18am [+]

I know jappy, the current admin. may apply but not majority of the people,
by larrynelmira on Sat Jul 02, 05 9:21am [+]

No they shouldn't.

And no, the US isn't a fundamentalist regime. You really seem to have trouble with the definitions of these terms steel. I suggest you invest in a dictionary.
by herzog on Sat Jul 02, 05 10:54am [+]

Hmmmm so you are saying that the current administration would have been elected without the help of a huge fundamentalist christian vote?

Who is deluding you.
by Steelhamster on Sat Jul 02, 05 1:47pm [+]

Well jappy from what i see written on ballots thats exactly how people describe muslims. if you accept that muslims are fundamentalists then you have to accept that chistians are too. Of course if you dont accept that being a muslim makes you a fundamentalist then i agree with you.
by mobsie666 on Sat Jul 02, 05 7:22pm [+]

See, that proves my point steel. You don't know that these words mean. Simply being associated with religion does not make something fundamentalist. Hell, ghandi largely followed religious teachings, does that make him a wild eyed fanatical fundamentalist? Like I said, learn the meanings of words before you use them and we can save a good deal of time here.
by herzog on Mon Jul 04, 05 3:45pm [+]

We could save a lot more time if Zerhog would use the truth more.
by cranky on Tue Jul 05, 05 4:27pm [+]

This get's tedious. If you're going to call me a liar at least point out what you believe I lied about.

Remember crank, like 'racist', liar isn't simply someone who proves you wrong. It has a real meaning, I suggest you look it up some time. You and steel could make a day of it.
by herzog on Tue Jul 05, 05 10:19pm [+]





About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | © 2002-2009 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved