WILL THE COMING HYDROGEN AGE BE BETTER THAN THE FOSSIL FUEL AGE?

user ballots

Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

prediction : technology : WILL THE COMING HYDROGEN AGE BE BETTER THAN THE FOSSIL FUEL AGE?

[+] serious ballot by um__yeah
created Wed Jul 13, 05
I'm a firm believer that pure science will always prevail through modern technology. Humans can lie, cheat, and kill, but when it comes to maintaining our way of life, the scientists will always be there with the answers.
It's now quite obvious that hydrogen will someday soon be a viable alternative to fossil fuel dependency for the whole world.
So...will the world be made safer? After all, we will have no reason to depend on foreign oil, no need for military presence in these hostile lands, because hydrogen is everywhere, hydro-electric dams will be modified into huge hydrogen production facilities. Why? because you require two things to make hydrogen: water, and electricity.
Will we have less wars? Will rich nations then devote their time towards nation building in poor, underdeveloped countries, where the only returns would be a better quality of life for it's citizens, and modest agricultural trade with the world?

Yes, the world will be better
No, there will always be strife in the world

Ballot #77283 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 1.5 © BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

similiar ballots:
95483. The new EPA fuel standards are set to dramatically lower the estimated fuel economy on hybrids. Will this effect your decision to purchase a hybrid?
104772. How low do you usually let your fuel tank go before you refill it?
110518. What would the world be like without need for imported fuel?
111435. Fuel TV!? Action Sports!? What is your FAV!?
118311. I flew over 250 miles this weekend, How much fuel did I burn?
123226. T/F: Nuclear power has been seriously considered as an alternate car fuel.
91302. Do you think the new fuel economy standards will make an appreciable impact?
125268. U.S. Congress orders oil companies to lower fuel prices...
79469. What's the hold up? Why aren't vehicles that operate on a gasoline alternative fuel being mass produced?
14467. Stop immigration, Dump Israel, Kill everyone on death row, Save the forests, Alternative fuel is awesome, Hot sauce is the best condiment!

COMMENTS:
It would be better, but you have to keep in mind if you get into an accident no matter what you are dead, because hydrogen is the most active element on the periodic table and is very easy to make a huge explosion. When that happens we must be prepared to accept the reprocussions that come along side the use of that technology

by Spartandude__1991 on Wed Jul 13, 05 8:27pm [+]

But these scientists are the same people who brought us into the atomic age,and the atomic bomb,the same people to make gun powder,and bullets. You can not take humans out of the equation,because scientist are human.We must always remember to look back at history in order to advance into the future

by Quinn_the_Eskimo on Wed Jul 13, 05 8:48pm [+]

As currently envisioned, Hydrogen is not being planned as an alternative to fossil fuel, but as an extension.

Current plans are to extract hydrogen from coal ... a fossil fuel.

The world will be ... different ... if this is enacted. Plus. I predict the entire world will not shift -- there will be holdouts that continue to use oil as long as it is available, until the costs outweight the infrastructure costs of converting.

Energy-related geopolitical power will shift. But so much is geared by the human components (greed, lying, cheating, killing, etc.) that the forms may shift, but the Status Quo will live on.

by Cathexis on Wed Jul 13, 05 9:19pm [+]

Will the oil giants allow us to have clean cheap hydrogen and be independant of their monopolies? Not any time soon. The technology is here and they suppress as much of it as they can. Hydrogen explosians are fairly safe compared to gas explosions because the hydrogen rises quickly and disipates in the atmosphere. The Hindenburg burned because it was covered in a highly flamable doping compound and thus the skin of the blimp caught fire. Since then most ppl have had an irrational fear of the technology. Good for the oil companiesl.

by VanHelsing on Wed Jul 13, 05 9:27pm [+]

I fear there will be no Hydrogen Age. Look at who's hugging all the patents.

by Paradoxical on Thu Jul 14, 05 2:41am [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact