IS IT POSSIBLE TO "SPREAD DEMOCRACY" WITHOUT PRACTICING IT?

user ballots

Newest Ballots
Newest Blogs
Private Ballots
Joke Ballots
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

ethics : IS IT POSSIBLE TO "SPREAD DEMOCRACY" WITHOUT PRACTICING IT?

[+] serious ballot by Cathexis
created Fri Jul 22, 05
Journalist Seymour Hersh has exposed attempts to fix the Iraq elections of January 30, 2005.

We already knew the myriad problems that undermined the initial undertaking: The lack of international observers present to certify a free and fair election, the massive fraud in the Kurdish areas of Northern Iraq (sanctioned by the United States, Hersh reveals), and the massive ballot-box stuffing all over the country.

And we knew that about a third of the country boycotted the election because they saw it as a rigged affair.

But what we did not know, until now, is the extent to which the United States funded both campaign activities and outright fraud on behalf of its hand-picked candidate, Iyad Allawi.

(Full article at http://www.newyorker. com/fact/content/articles/ 050725fa_fact)

The Bush Administration's most recent rationale for going to War was "the spread Democracy."

Do you believe it is possible to spread Democracy without actually practicing it?

Yes
To an extent
Not very effectively
No
Uncertain
Other

Ballot #77886 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 1.5 © BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

similiar ballots:
50973. "We can have democracy in this country or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." Do you agree?
34394. Under the new Iraqi "democracy" , how hard would you laugh if the Iraqis elected Saddam Hussein to be their leader?
86112. If someone who isn't black killed Sean "Puffy" "Puff Daddy" "P. Diddy" "Diddy" Combs, would that be a hate crime or a benefit to society?
66521. Best ways to spread Democracy?
118406. How to spread democracy if not by force?
13619. Why do so many dumb whites write "Black's" instead of "Blacks" or "black people"?
84545. Which is actually ruining the season: the use of "Season's Greetings" and "Happy Holidays," or the whole argument that there's a "war on Christmas"?
86514. When someone writes "of" instead of "have" and/or "are" instead of "our," does that annoy the holy hell out of you?
9931. Why Do People Always Ruin Ballots By Adding Stuff Like "My Di*ck", "Sex" Or "P*ssy"
30022. Should companies that create 9/11 products such as licence plate borders that say "Remember 9/11" and "Let's Roll" be fined by the government?

COMMENTS:
No, if this is true its a shame.

by ABC on Fri Jul 22, 05 1:23pm [+]

UHhh we do practice it. And funding a campaign isn't anti-democracy.

by Dani_dysfunk on Fri Jul 22, 05 5:54pm [+]

Dani: Foreign countries pouring money into a national election hardly seems Democratic.

Oh, and in case you missed it ... there was also "outright fraud."

But then again ... you may be used to this, after these past five years or so.

by Cathexis on Fri Jul 22, 05 7:08pm [+]

I'm sure I'm not the only person in the US who rolled his eyes and threw up his hands in disgust when we heard that the Bush admin. is going to hold free elections for the Iraqi people when he has no interest in any kind of fair contest here or elsewhere.

by weebles48 on Sat Jul 23, 05 6:30am [+]

I remember a phrase from one of "The three musketeers" movie; they were talking about the siege of La Rochelle and the conclusion was: "we bombed them to teach them what christian mercy is". I think is quite suited to our modern problem.

by johan_moritz on Sat Jul 23, 05 8:29am [+]

Hmmm.

Point 1: We did not need to "fix" the election results in Iraq. We simply applied the same rules of "democracy" we practice at home: Select all the candidates who get to run, get the population to see this as a real democratic choice, and win however it comes out.

Point 2: American Democracy in action: One candidate for President receives 500,000 more votes than another, but is "defeated" in the race.

Actually, Cathexis, we are not spreading democracy in the world, we are contaminating the world with the American brand of Oligarchy.

by xxxxxxxx on Sat Jul 23, 05 1:35pm [+]

About as possible as it is to spread Aids without being infected

by kingAlfredTheGreat on Thu Dec 22, 05 9:44pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact