political : IS PAT ROBERTSON TELLING THE TRUTH? HE NOW SAYS HE WAS "MISINTERPRETED." [+] ballot by cranky ACTIVE Wed Aug 24, 05 - Mon May 19, 08 (CNN) -- Conservative religious broadcaster Pat Robertson said Wednesday that his remarks about the removal of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez were taken out of context and that he never called for the killing of the Latin American leader. "I didn't say 'assassination.' I said our special forces should 'take him out.' And 'take him out' can be a number of things, including kidnapping; there are a number of ways to take out a dictator from power besides killing him. I was misinterpreted by the AP , but that happens all the time," Robertson said on "The 700 Club" program. (Watch video) The controversy began Monday when Robertson called Chavez "a terrific danger" bent on exporting Communism and Islamic extremism across the Americas. (Full story) "If he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think we really ought to go ahead and do it," said Robertson on Monday's program. "It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war." (Watch Robertson's comments) "We have the ability to take him out, and I think the time has come that we exercise that ability," he said. "We don't need another $200 billion war to get rid of one strong-arm dictator. It's a whole lot easier to have some of the covert operatives do the job and then get it over with." So, is Pat Robertson telling the truth when he says that he was misinterpreted? Or is he lying? He's telling the truth He's lying he said more than that both prior and after those statements and it's been a while.i can't judge ei he said more than that both prior and after those statements and it's been a while.i can't judge ei SORRY, THIS POLL IS NOW CLOSED. Ballot #79692 : Voting Finished : SEE RESULTS Comment: show your vote with comment?

v 2.0

© BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank: