search this site: search the web:

WHAT SPORT IS BETTER - RUGBY OR AMERICAN FOOTBALL?

best : sports :

WHAT SPORT IS BETTER - RUGBY OR AMERICAN FOOTBALL?


[+] ballot by SYFL101
created Thu Dec 11, 03

Do you prefer helmet wearing pussies or real sportsmen who aren't pumped full of steroids!

Rugby is better
American Football is better
I like both
I hate both
I couldn't care less
I like all sports
I hate all sports
At least it's not ballet
What's Rugby!?
Ich verstehe nicht

Ballot #8103 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:
Register to submit comments
You may still vote without registration

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:








similiar ballots:
68641. American Football fans. Tell me all about Malcolm Glazer, the man who wants to take over Manchester United (the richest football club in the world).
59422. Is soccer (football) really a sissy sport?
13235. Why is it when English people play rugby, they wear no pads, but when Americans play "football", they wear them? Are their bodies realy that frail?
4929. Should Blitzball become a real American Sport?
2392. Which football (american) team is the best?
16511. american or european football?
16296. Why Do American Have No Interest In Soccer? (Football)
53896. Which is the best league football (ie not american) team in the world
14145. Brits - Do you really care that England won the Rugby World Cup?
84195. AMERICAN CORPORATIONS ARE GUILTY OF SANCTIONED TREASON WHEN THEY SHIP AMERICAN MANUFACTURING JOBS OVERSEAS. Y/N




whatisit? - smilesheet - quick ref. - hel.lo v.0.01

COMMENTS:
They both suck. Baseball rules! :-)
by Biggus_Dickus on Tue Dec 16, 03 4:04pm [+]

I never understood why those rugby players get hurt real bad....
by lcd on Wed Dec 24, 03 2:21am [+]

Rugger is the best next to boxing
by nollie_man on Fri Dec 26, 03 7:01pm [+]

rugby is a real mans sport game! any sport that involves padding are for pussies!
by waynekerr on Fri Dec 26, 03 7:04pm [+]

bullshit G669af u dont know shit. i HAVE played both sports and i have to say rugby is definitely a more vigorous contact sport that requires strength, speed and agility. the players are tough, more smarter strategically. better ball handling skills, hits are more harder and are much fitter - they have to be cause rugby doesnt stop continuously unlike g/iron where the game is of short periods of hard action. rugby only stops at halftime for a couple of mins - 40mins 1st and 2nd half. it makes it much more faster more exciting but when it comes to tackling a rugby player, they got to rely on their strength in their body rather than the bullshit armored shoulders and helmets g/iron players wear. so basically rugby makes gridiron a sport for sissies.
by waynekerr on Sun Dec 28, 03 6:36pm [+]

i've played both, the hardest hits came from the speacil teams of american football, the kickoff or punts were incredily violent, but teh scrums of rugby hurt also, by and by i say both sports hurt alot.
by doen5167 on Sun Jan 11, 04 9:45am [+]

What you don't see in rugby is players getting kneed in the head in the scrum, and eye-gouged in rucks, usually by the French!! The French props used to head butt each other before matches and come onto the field already bleeding. Mentalists
by bushy_beard on Mon Jan 12, 04 6:30pm [+]

American football players wear equipment because the hits are much harder. Wearing armor allows one to hit harder. The strongest lineman is stronger than any rugby player, but slower. The best wideouts are faster than any rugby player, but can't take hits as well. Rugby has well-rounded athletes, while football uses specialization.
by Weltall on Mon Jan 12, 04 9:23pm [+]





About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | © 2002-2009 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved