political : SHOULD A SPECIAL COUNSEL BE AUTHORIZED TO LOOK AT POSSIBLE BUSH IMPEACHMENT? [+] serious ballot by Cathexis ACTIVE Wed Jan 04, 06 - Sun Jun 22, 08 Barron's, the rather rightwing business journal published by the Wall Street Journal, argued in a Dec. 24, 2005 editorial: "Willful disregard of a law is potentially an impeachable offense. It is at least as impeachable as having a sexual escapade under the Oval Office desk and lying about it later. The members of the House Judiciary Committee who staged the impeachment of President Clinton ought to be as outraged at this situation. They ought to investigate it, consider it carefully and report either a bill that would change the wiretap laws to suit the president or a bill of impeachment." "It is important to be clear that an impeachment case, if it comes to that, would not be about wiretapping, or about a possible constitutional right not to be wiretapped. It would be about the power of Congress to set wiretapping rules by law, and it is about the obligation of the president to follow the rules in the acts that he and his predecessors signed into law." Bush has admitted to breaking federal law. This is a potentially impeachable offense. That being said, here is the ballot question: ***Should Congress authorize a Special Counsel to look into the matter of possible impeachment proceedings against George W Bush?*** (IMPORTANT: I am not asking if Bush is guilty or whether or not he should be impeached; but whether there is enough evidence to start a Special Counsel investigation.) Yes: Start an investigation No: (explain) Undecided Other Ballot #85370 : SEE RESULTS Comment: show your vote with comment?

v 2.0

© BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank: