WHICH IS A MORE LEGITIMATE SCIENCE: INTELLIGENT DESIGN OR ASTROLOGY?

user ballots

Newest Ballots
Newest Blogs
Private Ballots
Joke Ballots
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

best : WHICH IS A MORE LEGITIMATE SCIENCE: INTELLIGENT DESIGN OR ASTROLOGY?

[+] ballot by xxxxxxxx
ACTIVE Sun Feb 19, 06 - Fri Nov 14, 08

Intelligent design.
Astrology.
They're both legitimate sciences, thank you very much.
Neither

Ballot #88452 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 1.5 © BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

similiar ballots:
10232. Is There Anything To Astrology Or Is It Junk Science?
97455. Evolution, intelligent design, or creationism?
74029. The 'Intelligent Design' theory of Creation: your opinion?
87193. Do you see humor in the fact that both the religious and scientific communities have come out against intelligent design?
79553. Since Bush wants equal time for intelligent design in classrooms, should evolution get equal time in churches?
12243. Is astrology stupid?
110532. What is Your Astrology Sign?
92814. Is astrology simply the ancient art of psychology?
9777. Top Ten Mistakes in Web Design
32333. If you could design your own TV Show, what would it be?

COMMENTS:
Both are a load of BS!

by Colin_B on Tue Dec 19, 06 1:44pm [+]

I don't know much about astrology, but I'm tied down in causality, and I like it. If I can conceive a causal link then I might buy it.

Intelligent design as an argument was {I think} born out of science in folks looking at patterns in nature and concluding that surely to God couldn't be by chance alone.

They find that the basic rules of the universe are so finely balanced that the slip of any of them in and direction would mean no humans. So it must have been planned.

To me that's quite a leap. I believe that:
In retrospect *everything* is certain, and was always inevitable.
- hindsight is a wonderful thing.

Also, I watched something once {and I've helpfully forgotten what %| } in which someone had worked out that there was more chance we are the result of design than not. This was named "The Simulation Hypothesis", and didn't necessarily mean there was a traditional God as the creator, so much as some extra dimensional geek playing 'The Sims' or running a climate simulation. I think this fed the God hypothesis version of intelligent design.

I'm currently agnostic, with atheistic leanings, but do concede that just as someone can't show me "God", I can't show them "not God".

If there is/are a God/s, I think it's probably be time for a regime change up there. Vote Monkey!

by willistine on Tue Apr 03, 07 12:48pm [+]

Voted : Neither
Astrology sometimes pretends to be 'scientific'..but it isn't of course.
'Creation science' is likewise not any kind of 'science', but attempts to imitate Science in an effort to support their 'theological' outlook. Theology is not Science. Science deals with Objective Reality far better than any religion or belief system.
Ultimately, whatever "happens" to be The Truth, is The Truth!

by BitAndByte on Mon Oct 15, 07 4:28pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact