IS THE POSSESSION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IMMORAL (REGARDLESS OF COUNTRY, ORGANIZATION OR GROUP)?
user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
ethics
:
IS THE POSSESSION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION IMMORAL (REGARDLESS OF COUNTRY, ORGANIZATION OR GROUP)?
[+]
serious
ballot by
FiddleFaddleOnLSD
ACTIVE Fri Mar 03, 06 - Thu Jul 12, 07
Nuclear, chemical, biological, radiological, etc.
Yes, it is
No, it is not
Ballot #89393 :
SEE RESULTS
Comment:
show your vote with comment?
v 2.0
©
BEST
AND
WORST
.COM
smile bank
:
similiar ballots:
54067.
'The desire to create weapons of mass destruction' is NOT the same as actually HAVING weapons of mass destruction. Do you agree?
83443.
Weapons of Mass destruction]!!!
12066.
Which nations have weapons of mass destruction and should be disarmed?
64612.
"We're going to Iraq because Saddam has weapons of mass destruction!!!!!" -- Republicans, circa early 2003.
39479.
Dose the U.S. military use macdonalds as a weapon of mass destruction?
74935.
After eating a lot, my ass can be considered a weapon of mass destruction. Should I fear Bush going ... well, you know ... ?
85109.
The CEO for a major corporation sells weapons to a country that the US considers an enemy and then gives the profits from the sale of these weapons...
101883.
Promoting one religion & destruction of all others equate to a hate group?
68978.
Weapons of Mass Destraction - the most dangerous in George W. Bush's arsenal?
16472.
Which country should not be allowed Nuclear Weapons
COMMENTS:
No comments yet. Be the first to write one in!
About Us
|
Join Us
|
Privacy Policy
|
Contact
© 2002-2008
Best
And
Worst
.com
All Rights Reserved
