IF IT WERE GENETICALLY DETERMINED WHILE IN THE WOMB THAT YOUR KID WOULD BE STUPID (NOT RETARDED, JUST STUPID), WOULD YOU HAVE IT ABORTED?

user ballots

ethics :

IF IT WERE GENETICALLY DETERMINED WHILE IN THE WOMB THAT YOUR KID WOULD BE STUPID (NOT RETARDED, JUST STUPID), WOULD YOU HAVE IT ABORTED?


[+] ballot by xxxxxxxx
ACTIVE Sat Mar 04, 06 - Thu Nov 27, 08

Say the kid you and your significant other were expecting was going to end up being a serious dumbass, and this was able to be detected genetically while in the womb from samples of DNA or whatever. And I'm not talking average, mediocre, or kind of dumb. I'm talking flat-out stupid. Would you abort it? What would you do?

Yes, I'd have it aborted.
No, I'd bring it to term.
I'd bring it to term, but put it up for adoption.
Too bad George H.W. and Barbara Bush didn't know about this


Ballot #89483 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 1.5 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
122063. Am I stupid?
4449. Are Americans Stupid?
4576. Why are Southerners so Stupid?
12243. Is astrology stupid?
12657. What is the most stupid thing to do?
42182. This is a stupid ballot...
93938. Which question is the most stupid?
110684. How stupid do the neo cons think we all are?
111091. Have you ever done anything stupid out of fear?
111440. Are any of your children stupid?


COMMENTS:
No comments yet. Be the first to write one in!






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved