SHOULD THE GENERAL PUBLIC HAVE 100% KNOWLEDGE OF EVERYTHING THAT THE MILITARY IS DOING, ON THE BATTLEFIELD AND OFF?

user ballots

news related :

SHOULD THE GENERAL PUBLIC HAVE 100% KNOWLEDGE OF EVERYTHING THAT THE MILITARY IS DOING, ON THE BATTLEFIELD AND OFF?


[+] serious ballot by jappy
ACTIVE Tue Mar 14, 06 - Sun Dec 07, 08

Does the general public have the right to know about every activity involving the military?

Would this knowledge lead to greater accountability and fiscal and social responsibility by the military?

Or would the graphic details of many of the necessary actions of armed conflict be too much for the public as a whole to understand, and also compromise the security of the military in general?

Yes, the public should have full knowledge
No, the public should not know everything

Ballot #90212 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 1.5 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
119079. Run For Public Office, Vote, Join The Military, Or Shut Up...
95487. Does a lack of understanding about the history of Iraq undermine the public image of the United States military?
94855. True or False? Love Is A Battlefield?
17036. Is all knowledge relative?
125731. Do you just repeat knowledge or do you use it??
63130. How good is your knowledge of geography?
111264. Based On Current Knowledge, What Is The World's Deepest Ocean ?
116027. Food additives: have you knowledge or concern about Ficin or Bromelain?
57790. What cartoon character would you like to nail? [screw, boff, lay, fuck, have carnal knowledge of...you get the idea.]
90553. If you started a shift at your job with forewarned knowledge that you'd be fired before the end of the shift, what would you do?


COMMENTS:
Voted : No, the public should not know everything
if the public knew everything then #1 the war would be pointless -_- and #2 we would have no one to blow up
by shizz on Thu Oct 19, 06 5:03pm [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved