search this site:
search the web:
Don't support major websites, use a small ones like this one!
TACTICAL NUKES -- STILL NUCLEAR WAR?
user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
political
:
TACTICAL NUKES -- STILL NUCLEAR WAR?
[+]
serious
ballot by
Cathexis
ACTIVE Wed Apr 12, 06 - Mon Dec 03, 07
Every rational person is against starting a 'Nuclear War.'
But ... is launching nuclear weapons more acceptable if the weapons are 'tactical' nukes?
Yes: Not really a 'Nuclear War'
No: This still constitutes a 'Nuclear War'
CANCELED -- see 92268
Ballot #92267 :
SEE RESULTS
Comment:
show your vote with comment?
v 2.0
©
BEST
AND
WORST
.COM
smile bank
:
similiar ballots:
92268.
Does using 'Tactical Nukes' mean it is not a Nuclear War?
59763.
Why is the western world in an uproar over Iran obtaining nuclear weapons when Israel (70 UN resolutions against it) has a stockade of nukes?
100045.
Possible scenario? Iran nukes Israel; U.S. nukes Iran.
126946.
Would you want your enemy to have nukes?
14384.
please answer! could the us take over the world w/ no nukes?
67949.
Why did North Korea admit to having nukes?
102613.
Should Bush demand that Pakistan surrender its nukes?
111909.
If terrorism and nukes didn't exist, would the Republican party?
106693.
Should we offer Kim Jong Il a movie career in exchange for his nukes?
113200.
Is there a possibility that Bush/Cheney will attack Iran with nukes?
COMMENTS:
No comments yet. Be the first to write one in!
About Us
|
Join Us
|
Privacy Policy
|
© 2002-2008
Best
And
Worst
.com
All Rights Reserved