search this site: search the web:
Tired of Porn sites? Try something new! Bestandworst.com is just as good (not really)

THE OFFICIAL POVERTY LEVEL IS LOWER FOR CITIZENS AGED 65+. IS THIS FAIR?

user ballots

political :

THE OFFICIAL POVERTY LEVEL IS LOWER FOR CITIZENS AGED 65+. IS THIS FAIR?


[+] serious ballot by texsue57
ACTIVE Thu Apr 20, 06 - Tue Jan 13, 09

Someone who is 18-64 who is the only person in their household is considered to be living in poverty if they make $10,160 or less per year. But that figure is $9,367 for senior citizens.

Do you think this is fair?

Yes
No


Ballot #92825 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
111441. Are you embarrassed by the level of poverty you live in?
105678. Does the government purposely keep people at poverty level?
72754. U.S. citizens: isn't it patriotic to pay your fair share of taxes - for the privilege of living in this great country?
105792. Are present day American citizens like citizens of Nazi Germany?
52005. The citizens of which industrial country kills more of its own citizens than any other?
125701. It's official. Yes it's very official people.
24639. Who drives worse? Teenagers or those aged 75+?
70031. Everyone talks about Dick Clark and Cher having never aged. What about Gene Wilder?
94134. What is the most pathetic thing you can think of a middle-aged person doing to "reclaim their youth"?
95435. Young - middle aged males are the most likely to commit rape, women should you be extra cautious of this group when you're out alone at night?


COMMENTS:
Note: Those figures are for 2005.
by texsue57 on Thu Apr 20, 06 6:39pm [+]

It's not fair, it's discriminatory.

The government assumes that senior citizens need less than the youth. Well, the government is wrong. It forgets that some people need more than others. It forgets that some senior citizens can't afford medicare because they aren't covered. What a beautiful world we live in.
by Liberal_Democrat on Thu Apr 20, 06 6:45pm [+]

No, but who gives a rat's ass about the poor in America these days. It is all their fault they are poor and they are all a bunch of lazy welfare bums.

Of course I am being sarcastic, but that is how many look at it.
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Thu Apr 20, 06 7:17pm [+]

Don't they have less taxes stolen out and get lots of discounts. The difference is probably due to differences in purchasing power.
by thc2883 on Fri Apr 21, 06 3:18am [+]

No. I believe there was an argument that they had fewer work-related expenses, typically being in retirement. However, in a private healthcare system, such savings are more than offset by rising healthcare costs.
by Cathexis on Fri Apr 21, 06 7:13am [+]

^The healthcare system in this country is anything but private. However, I did not take into account their greater medical expenses, that would probably bring their poverty level way up.
by thc2883 on Fri Apr 21, 06 2:15pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved