user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
was it an intentional act of cultural insensitivity? doubtful. is it sad and extremely hard to pathom what historical treasures are now lost? yes. i sincerely doubt that the average soldier would understand the ramifications and most certainly would not do so on purpose.
war is all about murdering, raping, looting and pillaging - always has been, always will be. that's not to say every soldier who signs up realizes what he or she has got themselves into and what they will become involved in. but.... war is destruction - that is its nature. we shouldn't enter into one lightly, we shouldn't nter into one if there are any other options available. Destroying an ancient site is an unforgiveable wrong, regardless of whether it was intentional. Ignorance is no excuse.
When will they learn?
you're talking about soldier here. soldiers under immense threat and in a very volitile situation. lay the blame at the top command if you want, but not on the regular soldier -- i'm sure they had no idea. and yes, if it was unitentional, it makes all the difference in the world.
It may be insensitive, but, as Patton said, "It's warrrr, son."
Oh well fuck'em.
If I had it my way The American military would only respect the native culture when it doesn't get in the way of military operations.
Yes, but while Iraqis may claim closer genetic affinity with the Babylonians, the US is probably closer culturally.
^Perhaps where the fundamentalist Muslims in Iraq and the fundamentalist Christians in the U.S. are concerned. One conservative to another.
The BABYLONIANS were not fundamentalists.
^That's right. "An eye for an eye" was developed by Jimmy Carter.
"An eye for an eye" Which any educated man knows is the definition of fundamentalism and not a principle that has been adopted by many cultures independently.
^Except the ones used in my comparison.
Do you know which ones you're talking about?
|
|