search this site: search the web:
Millions of web visitors a month. Millions of votes. Join Us!

IS THIS AN ACT OF CULTURAL INSENSITIVITY?

user ballots

news related :

IS THIS AN ACT OF CULTURAL INSENSITIVITY?


[+] serious ballot by cranky
ACTIVE Thu May 11, 06 - Tue Feb 03, 09

US marines offer Babylon apology

By Jonathan Charles
BBC World affairs correspondent

A senior US marine officer says he is willing to apologise for the damage caused by his troops to the ancient Iraqi site of Babylon.

US forces built a helicopter pad on the ancient ruins and filled their sandbags with archaeological material in the months following the 2003 invasion.

Colonel Coleman was chief of staff at Babylon when it was occupied by the First Marine Expeditionary Force.

Babylon's Hanging Gardens were among the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World.

Col Coleman told the BBC that if the Iraqis wanted an apology for the destruction caused by his men he was willing to give one.

The 2,000 troops who were deployed there did immense damage as they set up camp amidst the ruins of old temples.

A helicopter pad was constructed at the site. The vibration from landings led the roof of one building to collapse.

The soldiers also filled their sandbags with archaeological artefacts, just because they were lying around and easy to pick up.

The head of the Iraqi State Board for Heritage and Antiquities, Donny George, is angry and says the mess will take decades to sort out.

Col Coleman argues that whatever his troops did, the alternative would have been far worse.

If they hadn't moved in, Babylon would have been left at the mercy of looters, he says. (BBC)

However, John Curtis, of the British Museum said: "It's grossly irresponsible to establish a military camp on a sensitive archeological site of world importance like Babylon."

* * * * * * * *

So, what do you think? Was this an act of cultural insensitivity, or are the critics of the U.S setting up a military base on top of the ruins of one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World just a bunch of whiners?

Cultural Insensitivity
No problem. If they don't like it, tough
yes, it is, but most likely it was unintentional


Ballot #94079 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:










similiar ballots:
118875. What Is Your Opinion Of The 1960's Cultural Revolution?
106631. Which of these multi-cultural oaths sounds the most insulting?
38546. What makes your national identity: your birthplace or your cultural heritage?
112647. Asians declare cultural traditions are more important than human rights?
62600. Do you think the British and American leaders fully examined the religious and cultural differences in Iraq before invading?
84556. Cultural and linguistic diversity are to be cherished, but all must subscribe to a single standard of human rights. Agree or Disagree?


COMMENTS:
was it an intentional act of cultural insensitivity? doubtful. is it sad and extremely hard to pathom what historical treasures are now lost? yes. i sincerely doubt that the average soldier would understand the ramifications and most certainly would not do so on purpose.
by Kev24 on Thu May 11, 06 11:31am [+]

war is all about murdering, raping, looting and pillaging - always has been, always will be. that's not to say every soldier who signs up realizes what he or she has got themselves into and what they will become involved in. but.... war is destruction - that is its nature. we shouldn't enter into one lightly, we shouldn't nter into one if there are any other options available. Destroying an ancient site is an unforgiveable wrong, regardless of whether it was intentional. Ignorance is no excuse.
by lightreaper on Thu May 11, 06 12:42pm [+]

When will they learn?
by Truthseeker013 on Thu May 11, 06 12:45pm [+]

you're talking about soldier here. soldiers under immense threat and in a very volitile situation. lay the blame at the top command if you want, but not on the regular soldier -- i'm sure they had no idea. and yes, if it was unitentional, it makes all the difference in the world.
by Kev24 on Thu May 11, 06 1:48pm [+]

It may be insensitive, but, as Patton said, "It's warrrr, son."
by xxxxxxxx on Thu May 11, 06 2:06pm [+]

Oh well fuck'em.
by lowerclassbrats on Thu May 11, 06 4:31pm [+]

If I had it my way The American military would only respect the native culture when it doesn't get in the way of military operations.
by lowerclassbrats on Thu May 11, 06 4:35pm [+]

Yes, but while Iraqis may claim closer genetic affinity with the Babylonians, the US is probably closer culturally.
by thc2883 on Fri May 12, 06 3:13am [+]

^Perhaps where the fundamentalist Muslims in Iraq and the fundamentalist Christians in the U.S. are concerned. One conservative to another.
by cranky on Fri May 12, 06 8:28pm [+]

The BABYLONIANS were not fundamentalists.
by thc2883 on Sat May 13, 06 2:46am [+]

^That's right. "An eye for an eye" was developed by Jimmy Carter.
by cranky on Sat May 13, 06 7:41am [+]

"An eye for an eye"

Which any educated man knows is the definition of fundamentalism and not a principle that has been adopted by many cultures independently.
by thc2883 on Sun May 14, 06 3:02am [+]

^Except the ones used in my comparison.
by cranky on Sun May 14, 06 10:51am [+]

Do you know which ones you're talking about?
by thc2883 on Sun May 14, 06 4:42pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy |
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved