ARE "PRUSSIAN BLUE" VICTIMS OF CHILD ABUSE?

user ballots

Newest Ballots
Newest Blogs
Private Ballots
Joke Ballots
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes

Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz

TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase

Discussion
Bug Report

worst : ethics : ARE "PRUSSIAN BLUE" VICTIMS OF CHILD ABUSE?

[+] serious ballot by wideheadofknowledge
ACTIVE Thu May 18, 06 - Thu Apr 17, 08
Until about 1 hour ago I had never heard of "Prussian Blue", I stumbled over them in the course of prolognged bout of Wikipedia trawling.

For those who don't know they are a teenaged, white-supremacist (read: nazi) pop-group.
They are holocaust "revisionist" (up to the point of linking to denier sites on their home page) and they wear lovely clothes like the Happy Hitler T-shirts shown in the pic.
In an ABC interview they also mentioned how they thought that Hitler was a great man with "good ideas".

Having been home-schooled by their neo-nazi mother I ask a simple question: are the victims of child abuse and as such should they be removed into protective custody?

Yes, they are victims. Save them now!
No they are evil! Burn them! BURN THEM!
They are perfectly entitled to deny the holocaust. At least they have a hobby.
I wouldn't call it abuse, but it's definitely not cool

Ballot #94424 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 1.5 © BESTANDWORST.COM

smile bank:

similiar ballots:
113614. Do you find these lyrics by Prussian Blue to be racist?
106555. Child abuse, do you intervene?
117602. What should the penalty be for child abuse?
72992. What should be done to reduce or eliminate child abuse?
118323. Should persons convicted of child abuse be sterilized?
112598. If parents smoke in front of children, should that be child abuse?
116773. Australia defends anti-child abuse measures
70349. Conservatives like to portray themselves as victims. If that's true, since they control everything, would that make them victims of their own idiocy?
80117. Why do some people who obviously aren't victims constantly whine about being victims?
94914. Is beating a child with a Bible a good child-rearing technique?

COMMENTS:
I would look them up but im in the university library, and I dont think I should be checking out Neo Nazi websites on their website lol

by lil_ape on Thu May 18, 06 6:03pm [+]

As for your question, I would hesitantly answer no, they are not victims of child abuse.

Its natural for children to learn from and to some degree imitate their parents behaviour and views. The proces sof their mother "teaching" them to be little nazis is no less natural than liberal mothers teaching their children to hate nazis, or a feminist mother encouraging her daughter to distrust men.

You cant start taking children away from their parents because you dont agree with their politics, thats a slippery slope towards an interfering nanny state, and could lead to serious infringements on civil rights.

by lil_ape on Thu May 18, 06 6:07pm [+]

They're idiots that will never be accepted by anyone with any common sense. Losers. Ugly little witches to boot. They will have very miserable lives, of that I'm sure.

by patch22us on Thu May 18, 06 7:01pm [+]

Besides, people like these two creatures are basically poor white trash. Seriously, they're not even a full rung up from gutter trash.

by patch22us on Thu May 18, 06 7:11pm [+]

They're not victims of child abuse. They're just simply victims of innoculation of very messed-up values.

by xxxxxxxx on Thu May 18, 06 8:58pm [+]

Somethign *should* be done to stem the sickness before it speads too far.

by Truthseeker013 on Fri May 19, 06 1:23pm [+]

Voted : No they are evil! Burn them! BURN THEM!
They're evil. They're supposedly in advanced history classes, they're smart enough to think for themselves.

by nuckinfutz on Sun Dec 17, 06 11:40pm [+]

About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact