IS THERE ANYONE WHO IS HONESTLY CLAIMING THAT TWO PLANES DIDN'T HIT THE TWIN TOWERS?

user ballots

IS THERE ANYONE WHO IS HONESTLY CLAIMING THAT TWO PLANES DIDN'T HIT THE TWIN TOWERS?


[+] serious ballot by xxxxxxxx
ACTIVE Sun Jun 04, 06 - Fri Feb 27, 09

In seemingly every ballot which debates the events of the 9/11, the people who believe the government's account always say something to the effect of that they firmly believe that two airplanes hit the Twin Towers that fateful day.

The thing is, nobody seems to be attempting to debunk THAT part. Not even Ken_From_Dublin. In fact, that's pretty much the only part of 9/11 which cannot be disputed.

So I must ask: Is there anyone who's actually arguing that two planes didn't hit the towers? And if nobody is, why do people keep bringing up the fact that they believe it happened when it's clearly not in dispute?

Comment please.

Yes, someone is claiming that, despite live TV evidence.
No, nobody's disputing that planes hit the WTC.
Actually my mom was doing jumping jacks and they fell
The ONLY people claiming this are all SHILLS making up this strawman argument
it was a UFO
Bush knew in advance and allowed them to crash - Neothe1
^Clinton knew, as far back as 1995^


Ballot #95321 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









COMMENTS:
Actually, I do recall at least one person trying to convince others that whatever crashed into the Twin Towers were not two passenger jets. I think one of the claims was that one of the jets was actually an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle or a fighter jet -- which would have to mean that not only was ALL of the different news footage faked, but the thousands of people on the ground who witnessed the events were also in on the conspiracy.

What maybe gets me the most though is that no one who believes it was a conspiracy has put forth any actual THEORY behind the conspiracy. I'm willing to temporarily agree that the whole thing is a conspiracy in order to hear the alternative explanation behind the conspiracy.
by Applerod on Sun Jun 04, 06 10:40pm [+]

Well they were still airplanes, even under that theory.
by xxxxxxxx on Mon Jun 05, 06 12:16am [+]

I've heard a similar theory, Applerod. But only the unmanned plane was painted and disguised to look like a passenger jet. And had missles mounted on the bottom.
by Grumpy_Person on Mon Jun 05, 06 12:24am [+]

Applerod

Not saying I belive or disbelieve the whole conspiracy, but the theory behind it would presumably involve the American government orchestrating the attack to frighten people into allowing the government to strip them of their human rights in the name of the "war on terror", like in 1984 basically. Creating an enemy for the public to hate is one sign of a fascist state.

Also, it helped garner support for a few invasions of Oil rich countries. Which makes sense really. The USA is the biggets economy on the planet, and subsequently uses the most resources. Yet its all for nothing if the Oil dries up. Indeed, OPEC have the power to essentially ruin the American economy by unexpectedely raising Oil prices, somehting that can only be combatted by the American government by securing the oil for themselves, i.e controlling the supply.

Until an alternative is found, Oil is the most valuable commodity on the planet, and worth killing a few thousand faceless people for Im afraid (from a government point of view)

It DOES all make sense, Its just a very hard thing to confirm or deny.
by lil_ape on Mon Jun 05, 06 2:50am [+]

"I've heard a similar theory, Applerod. But only the unmanned plane was painted and disguised to look like a passenger jet. And had missles mounted on the bottom."

Yes, I have heard people (the usual suspects) claim this. AND actually claim that there were no windows on the airplane. Like you can make out that detail on a airplane going 500 mph several thousand feet above you.

I also saw someone say what Applerod posted.

lil_ape... Looking at the Bush administration's "accomplishments" so far, do you really think they were capable of pulling this off?

It doesn't make any difference how much evidence or how many witnesses there were to conspiracy-minded people.
by FiddleFaddleOnLSD on Mon Jun 05, 06 5:48am [+]

I heard they were flying saucers, piloted by bigfoot (recent converts to islam) and the illuminati.

But of course the government will deny this, which means it's true.
by herzog on Mon Jun 05, 06 6:09am [+]

^Unfortunately, this is one "conspiracy" that cant be laughed off so easily IMO.
by lil_ape on Mon Jun 05, 06 6:17am [+]

I think it was just Elvis and John F. Kennedy playing some kind of holographic video game. MAG_rofl
by _Beelzebubba on Mon Jun 05, 06 7:54am [+]

It's a cheap strawman argument on their part. The conservative politicians do the same things against liberals. They make stupid claims like "Liberals want America to be Muslim" or "Liberals hate the constitution". Something that has nothing to do with the original topic.
by habeas_corpus on Tue Jun 06, 06 3:00pm [+]

path22us makes this strawman claim about other people saying "No planes hit the WTC" literally EVERYWHERE,on every 9/11 related ballot.

He resorts to this strawman argument and pretense about what other people are ALLEGED to have said - which they did NOT in fact say - because he doesn't have anything real to argue with.
by Lovelynice on Wed Jul 12, 06 8:02am [+]

A UFO hit the towers but the men in black are making up this 911 fable to cover that up.
By the way that was a joke.
by seon on Sun Jul 30, 06 10:35pm [+]

** karma **
by neothe1 on Mon Jul 31, 06 8:37pm [+]

Thanks neothe1, but I can speak for myself, there was a fourth plane that was shot down (Rumsfeld admitted this, as he did the missile), so stop lying on my behalf.

by Ken_from_Dublin on Tue Aug 01, 06 1:21pm [+]

^^^And unlike you, I don't have to lie on your behalf.

You clearly stated on one of my ballots that Bush knew in advance about the (PNAC) terrorist attacks and allowed them to happen, when I asked you why you believed this you replied 'Iraq', implying that it was to facilitate public support for a power and greed motivated war in the middle east.

Yes folks, neothe1 came out with the truth for once!
by Ken_from_Dublin on Tue Aug 01, 06 1:24pm [+]

ah, so you changed your mind yet again. before you said there was no fouth plane at all, because "obviously" there was no wreckage.
by neothe1 on Tue Aug 01, 06 7:45pm [+]

Lying again shill!

You just don't have a conscience do you???

- I challenge you to back up your lies by posting a quote from me where I state there was 'there was no fouth plane at all' (sic) here -> -> ->
by Ken_from_Dublin on Wed Aug 02, 06 3:15pm [+]

I'm still waiting shill!
by Ken_from_Dublin on Thu Aug 03, 06 5:03pm [+]

the old impossible demand routine.
by neothe1 on Thu Aug 03, 06 7:42pm [+]

Caught lying again, you have ZERO credibility.
by Ken_from_Dublin on Fri Aug 04, 06 1:56am [+]

caught lying? caught not wanting to go through your post history, murderer. not that you have anything against lying. you were the one ranting on about how there was no wreckage, just a strage smear on the ground, so there was no plane.
by neothe1 on Fri Aug 04, 06 11:41am [+]

You're only a liar and you know it -

You just don't have a conscience, or the courage of your convictions you worthless little spineless worm do you???

- So again I challenge you to back up your lies by posting a quote from me where I state there was 'there was no fouth plane at all' (sic) here -> -> ->

by Ken_from_Dublin on Fri Aug 04, 06 11:45am [+]

** karma **
by neothe1 on Fri Aug 04, 06 12:34pm [+]

you made the claims, kenny boy, you have no one to blame but yourself.
by neothe1 on Mon Aug 07, 06 7:22pm [+]

Back up your claimsliar - everyone can see by your failure to back up these false claims that you are a ....LIAR.

You really have painted yourself into a corner here.


.... LIAR
by Ken_from_Dublin on Tue Aug 08, 06 1:15pm [+]

i'm not making any claims, you made them. you said there was no crash site, saying "a plane can't just dissapear into the ground like that". you said there was no fouth plane.
by neothe1 on Mon Aug 14, 06 7:54pm [+]

{"a plane can't just dissapear into the ground like that". you said there was no fouth plane.
by neothe1 on Mon Aug 14, 06 7:54pm}

Then show a photo of the Flight 93 plane fuselage smashed into the ground instead of that little 12-20ft shallow crater.
by Lovelynice on Sun Aug 27, 06 11:55am [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved