user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Ahhhh...our tax dollars, hard at play.
Well they should make him a TV star then. He will probably earn less than most TV stars. and theres no script to write. just give him booze & drugs and you can idolise him too.
^where's your compassion? Clearly this guy just needs another couple of bucks to get back on his feet and that evil republican led FEMA is denying him this, and kicking him out of his new home. Heh.
Sounds like they just need to cut off his cable... and he probably would leave on his own.
by MO_ on Mon Jun 05, 06 6:57pm
[+]
^ I had a roomate like that once, he'd never leave the apartment and always had the TV on (wouldn't share). He missed his half of the payment for a month so I went ahead and cancelled it, I rarely saw him after that. I really wish I'd thought of that earlier. You know, this guy may be entitled to a free room under their squatters rights laws, but does that mean he's entitled to cable, electricity, water, maid service, etc at the hotels expense? Probably, or else I'm sure they would have tried it by now.
uhh, have you ever seen the holiday inn by kennedy? dude, trust me, he's not living in the lap of luxury. poor little lamb probably got bed bugs from that skank hotel.
The culture of "poverty". For some people, the amount of work required to live a better life is not worth more than leisure time. These people choose to live off the rest of us and do nothing, usually they live in what we consider poverty, but they're just as happy to live in luxury for zero work.
If this is true, and not yet another hyped up Rightist spin, it is an exception to the situation. In your aversion not to 'enable' the chimeric Mr. Johnson, you'd willingly screw over millions of others who really need the aid and use them for living expenses. Is anyone really that petty?
Put in controls, sure. But don't cut the aid.
'If this is true, and not yet another hyped up Rightist spin, it is an exception to the situation. In your aversion not to 'enable' the chimeric Mr. Johnson, you'd willingly screw over millions of others who really need the aid and use them for living expenses. Is anyone really that petty' Because I said that.
Send him back to Africa!!
Waiting for you-know-who to play the "racist" card.
me too
It's good to see that an isolated case can be used as proof that all poor people are the same. Cut off his cable etc... noone would disagree with that. Now I shall wait for this person who is going to play the racist card to come along too, as it isn't about race but about common decency.
'It's good to see that an isolated case can be used as proof that all poor people are the same' Again, I never said this. You and cath should form a club. Together I'm sure you could spend endless hours having conversations and what you infer you think I would have said in a specific situation, and then spend even more time criticizing me for probably, thinking of at one point, possibly making these statements, but not really. Seems to be your hobby on this site anyway.
' Now I shall wait for this person who is going to play the racist card to come along too, as it isn't about race but about common decency.' Come on, you know you want to say it. If you go to the link the guy in the picture is black, doesn't that make you want to type something? Perhaps something about how blacks are treated in america? I know you're bursting at the seams to say something. Go on, have a good time, no one will stop you.
aid would have helped him when he was a poor ignored kid. But no, it's better to ignore millions of kids until they're old enough to draw unemployment and buy guns :p
by Jyl on Tue Jun 06, 06 8:21pm
[+]
Well, I'm sure if you think long and hard you'll find a way to blame bush for that. Of course, since he probably developed this attitude from his local culture, friends and parents the way to fix it would have been to remove him, as a young child, from his home and family and have a better family raise him, in a better neighborhood. I doubt you'd favor that.
I don't particularly feel his colour has anything to do with his congenital laziness. I know plenty of white people who are just as lazy. As to your assertion that it wasn't a case of 'picking on the poor', I'm sorry if sarcasm doesn't translate in the written word. We all know what inference you were trying to make (at least the intelligent ones do) given that two thirds of your ballots are about the negative minority of a specific group, who you would have everyone believe (the ones less able to discern your agenda that is) is representative of that particular group.
"I doubt you'd favor that". As always, you can read my mind better than even *I can :p Actually ANYTHING to help those kids down there have futures would have been better than ignoring them.
by Jyl on Wed Jun 07, 06 3:50am
[+]
oh wait I almost forgot.. let me "think long and hard" of how to "blame Bush"
by Jyl on Wed Jun 07, 06 3:52am
[+]
Steel: nope, had nothing to do with race. Had everything to do with the mentality that people are unable to admit is closer to being the rule than the exception in New Orleans. WHich is why no amount of aid will do a great many of them any good. Which is why they spent plenty of energy looting big screen TVs on their backs, but now the city can't find many natives willing to participate in the rebuilding, so they're having to import workers from other states (which angers nagin as they aren't his beloved choclate people, but instead are damned mexicans, but that's another ballot). Actually this guy explains alot about why the rebuilding of New Orleans will probably fail. He happens to be black, but a city made of any ethnic group with this mentality would be a failure. And I did not know that he was black when I started on the article, I was simply pissed off by the title. Jyl: so you would favor kidnapping children and forcefully relocating them if their parents don't instill the proper morals and ethics in their kid?
oh just trust that Whatever EYE think is Wrong wrong wrong ;) 'Specially if it's about helping millions of kids born poor.
by Jyl on Wed Jun 07, 06 6:50am
[+]
|
|