user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Newest Ballots
Newest Blogs
Private Ballots
Joke Ballots
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Both do, along with George W. Bush! Sorry, its just how I feel.
Dead heat in a rat race.
Both are crazy but Kim Jong Il is surreal. His whole country is really.
Kim Jong Il.
Mahmoud is no crazier than G W Bush is. I really can't tell the difference in their rhetoric against each other.
Kim Jong Il is a truly dangerous man. He's also a very sneaky lunatic.
Why worry about Iran's leader anyway. He's democratically elected isn't he? Nobody has come up with any evidence of Iran having nukes, but everyone knows that North Korea does. North Korea is openly in violation of the NPT and international law. North Korea has the real capability to attack the USA's west coast, and is openly developing the missile technology to launch ICBMs with nuclear capability to attack the entire USA. They've said so, many times.
Iran is nowhere near as dangerous.
Gotta go with "The Donger" here. Anyone who inherited the position of leading a nation from his father is suspect in my book.
rnrnWe have a deplorable habit of needing to demonize and trivialize every opponent. And to encompass entire countries in one figurehead that we can hate.rnrn{italicize" of our opponents seem to have been "crazy" ... Hitler, Saddam, Qaddafi, Kim Il Jong, Ahmadinejad ...
What a coincidence.
But it's funny that Moamar Qadaffi -- the poster child for insanity decades ago -- is now a stable and dependable ally in the War on Terror (tm).
It can't be that we've just been engaging in schoolyard put-downs ... Moamar must have gotten better.
|
|
