=== Whether John McCain or Barack Obama, remember to register to vote! ===

SHOULD THE US SOLDIERS THAT RAPED AND KILLED THAT WOMAN BE TRIED IN IRAQ?

user ballots

ethics :

SHOULD THE US SOLDIERS THAT RAPED AND KILLED THAT WOMAN BE TRIED IN IRAQ?


[+] ballot by ABC
created Tue Jul 11, 06

What they did is inexcusable to anyone.

Yes
No
Comment
Be tried at the Hague


Ballot #97229 : SEE RESULTS

Comment:

show your vote with comment?

v 2.0 © BESTANDWORST.COM
smile bank:









similiar ballots:
75946. How many funerals of soldiers killed in Iraq has George W. Bush attended?
75776. American soldiers raping an Iraqi woman?
110583. How many U.S. soldiers have been wounded in Iraq?
33079. What are American soldiers doing with the people of Iraq?
104477. Who was killed by a woman?
126448. Was woman raped on telephone?
76998. Are the death of 2,000 American soldiers worth protecting Israel from Iraq?
17307. 500 American soldiers have died in Iraq so Bush could get revenge for his dad, Cheney could get huge Oil contracts, and Israel could be more secure...
101439. Woman killed in Italy by her family for smoking, wearing low cut jeans
76399. How many American chickenhawks have been killed in Iraq?


COMMENTS:
Very tough call ... I keep waivering on whether US or Iraq should have jurisdiction on this.
by Cathexis on Tue Jul 11, 06 12:54pm [+]

Perhaps an error of words or perhaps prejudical bias, I believe the former, but either way, the fair and proper ballot question should include the word "ALLEGED".
by Jinn_the_Kafir on Tue Jul 11, 06 1:12pm [+]

fair enough Jinn_the_Kafir, your right
by ABC on Tue Jul 11, 06 1:20pm [+]

No there is no way in hell he could get a fair and impartial jury in Iraq.Anyway the soldier that allegelly raped and murdered that 14 year old girl is now a civilian and he must be tried by a civilian court.If he was still enlisted he could be tried by the military court system.
by Corrupt on Tue Jul 11, 06 1:28pm [+]

Corrupt: Even if the alleged crime took place while he was in the military? I'd think a military court would still be approrpriate.
by Cathexis on Tue Jul 11, 06 2:04pm [+]

Iraqi constitution explicitly exempts american soldiers from being tried in Iraq. Doesn't seem very fair does it? and Bush calls that Iraqis governing their own people and country?

We should let them be tried in iraq, and be sentenced there. That's the only way to keep our rhetoric worth the paper it's written on, and prevent more of our soldiers from being targetted for revenge attacks.

by LCD on Tue Jul 11, 06 2:04pm [+]

Per
by Steelhamster on Tue Jul 11, 06 2:08pm [+]

... this could be a happy medium.
by Steelhamster on Tue Jul 11, 06 2:09pm [+]

Cathexis the Constitution prohibits civilians from being tried by military courts,tribunals etc.The circumstances may lead you to believe that because the event happened when he was a soldier he should be tried in a m.c.However the fact still remains that his status has changed from G.I to civilian and therefore the government must try him in civilian court.Not to do so would violate his 6th Amendmant right to a jury of his peers.


by Corrupt on Tue Jul 11, 06 8:14pm [+]

He committed the crime in Iraq, he should be tried in Iraq. Like it works under the laws of any other sovereign nation; but Iraq is not a sovereign nation is it? It's an occupied country and the oppressors always make the laws to protect their agents from legal prosecution by the oppressed.
by Tank_Girl on Wed Jul 12, 06 6:37pm [+]

yes
by Guest User from [24.178.84.11] on Fri Oct 20, 06 8:31am [+]






About Us | Join Us | Privacy Policy | Contact
© 2002-2008 BestAndWorst.com All Rights Reserved