user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Newest Ballots
Newest Blogs
Private Ballots
Joke Ballots
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Yes it does. If Bushes actions resulted in you not being able to eat, he'd be responsibe for you starving. Difference is, in your country it would be possible for you to call for his removal from power, without you and your family disappearing.
Would he feed us? No. Would he as president involve the government in food distribution, etc? Yes. Unless he wanted to be thrown out.
Kim is not starving his people. They were all fat and he has them on the Jenny Craig program with Ms. Kirstie Alley. Where do you folks get your news? Seriously though, Kim intentionally does nothing about the plight of his people, but he makes sure he's well fed, doesn't he.
Bush's job is to act in the best interests of his citizens, therefore he would be honor- and duty-bound to feed us, should famine ensue. As for Dear Leader...a bullet would suffice.
|
|