user ballots
Login
Register
Add One
FAQ/Contact
Popular Ballots
Recent Popular
Recent Votes
Best
Worst
Yes or No
Choices
What If
Prediction
Advice
Would You
Crime
Recommend
Quiz
TV & Movie
Music & Radio
Political
Science
Sports
Relationship
Techonology
Culture
Philosophy
Religion
Ethics
History
Food & Health
Fashion & Beauty
Crime
FanBase
Discussion
Bug Report
|
COMMENTS:
Anything is arbitrary, but they need some way to go after molesters.
Consent to what?
Consent to S - E - X
people should be liscenced on an individual basis based on strict standards. that goes for many things. driving, drinking, sex, piloting, using a computer, using a firearm, using any complex tool or vehicle, or really, doing anything. age limits just don't work, there is no correlation between maturity and age. maturity is based on experiences, age is just the time in which experiences may or may not happen.
I agree that tests for maturity would be nice, but who decides the criteria? Are you saying that we should have even more government control on our lives, and that people should be forced to apply for licenses to have sex? Why should we require government permission for our sex lives? Next they'll be taxing it.
I'm a little suprised how low those ages being voted are. I wish people would explain why they voted for what they voted for.
I believe it should be a case of asking at what age are a couple mutually mature enough to consent to an act that may land them in big trouble nine months down the road or earlier if they are faced with horror of choosing to abort the child's life and future in the sanctity of the womb.
Voted : 16
What does dressing 16 and 17-year-old young Japanese women (who aren't real) have to do with "sexualization" of REAL Western minors under 18? That's NOT grounds for a "moral" backlash! Try PSYCHOTIC!
|
|